LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PMFLIST Archives


PMFLIST Archives

PMFLIST Archives


May 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

5 passage culture (1 message)
5 passage culuture (3 messages)
5 passages from ATCC (1 message)
70% Isopropyl alcohol (2 messages)
<No subject> (2 messages)
animal derived peptone versus vegetable derived for use in rinsing solutions? (4 messages)
antimicrobial effectiveness (9 messages)
AOAC COUNTING RULES? (4 messages)
aseptic process validation media transport (3 messages)
ATCC Culture (2 messages)
AW: [PMFLIST] rotation of chemicals for sanitation - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (4 messages)
AW: [PMFLIST] Test for skin flora - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (1 message)
Basic Degree in Microbiology (7 messages)
Bioburden limits for API manufacturing (2 messages)
Bradyrhizobiaceae in water system - how to get rid of it? (3 messages)
Calculation of F0 Value (5 messages)
Call for papers (Fee-free article offer) (1 message)
Candida rugosa (4 messages)
CCI test (1 message)
Cell bank testing (1 message)
Centrifuging in non-sterile bottles (4 messages)
Cleaning procedures requalification (1 message)
Cleaning validation (7 messages)
Cleanroom Event (2 messages)
Compressed Air Sampling (3 messages)
Conservation of A. brasilensis (6 messages)
container closure integrity testing (1 message)
Control and uncntrol area (1 message)
Customer audits (4 messages)
Efficacy guidelines for Veterinary Disinfectant (1 message)
EM isolates and micro investigation (1 message)
endotoxin standard curve (5 messages)
Environmental monitoring (8 messages)
Environmental Monitoring Software (2 messages)
EO residuals (1 message)
Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions (11 messages)
Fumigation in Microbiology lab (8 messages)
fungi contamination in TSA and SCDA (3 messages)
Fw: [PMFLIST] Media Expiration and Use By date (1 message)
Fw: [PMFLIST] Media Expiration date (1 message)
Grow promotion test with Bacteroides vulgatus (2 messages)
Growth Promotion with Environmental Isolates (4 messages)
Help needed - identification of contaminant (4 messages)
Hydrolysates and endotoxin testing (1 message)
Identifying growth when its under the USP limits (9 messages)
incubator versus show case (1 message)
IV Bag Filling (1 message)
Lecithin/tween20 (2 messages)
Lipase production problem (5 messages)
media and sample viscosity (2 messages)
Media Expiration date (7 messages)
Microbial Air Sampler Vaidation. (1 message)
mold action level in EM (1 message)
Monitoring Sterility Test Incubators (3 messages)
Neutralization of Azithromycin dihydrate (1 message)
Number of Total Air Particle sites required per room from the ISO system (2 messages)
Odor testing in Process Water/ (1 message)
Out of Specification in microbiology (5 messages)
PDA Technical Document #13 Fundamentals of an EM Program (1 message)
plate 2 plate variation (7 messages)
PRESERVATIVE (10 messages)
preservative effectiveness test for oral solids (13 messages)
Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus (7 messages)
problems with the absense test of E.coli in antidepressants (3 messages)
Process simulation (2 messages)
Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets (10 messages)
Quality Management System of the Laboratory (3 messages)
R: [PMFLIST] Number of Total Air Particle sites required per room from the ISO system (1 message)
R: [PMFLIST] Out of Specification in microbiology (2 messages)
rotation of chemicals for sanitation (10 messages)
RV: [PMFLIST] preservative effectiveness test for oral solids (2 messages)
Sample Dilutions (3 messages)
solid Cfu calculation versus liquid cfu calculation (1 message)
supp. (8 messages)
Test for skin flora (14 messages)
Trying to find lost microbiologist (1 message)
TSA compare to SCDA (10 messages)
Urgent Help needed @ use of SDA w/o Antibiotics (3 messages)
use of sab dex with antibiotics (2 messages)
Use of SDA with antibiotics (1 message)
USP <81> (1 message)
UV light effect in dynamic passboxs. (2 messages)
validation of cryopreserved strains (2 messages)
Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria (14 messages)
Validation of Surface Monitoring Procedure (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PMFLIST Home

PMFLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

5 passage culture

Re: 5 passage culture

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 May 2010 13:20:29 -0400

141 lines

New Thread

5 passage culuture

5 passage culuture

sankar naryanan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 07:21:28 +0530

56 lines

Re: 5 passage culuture

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 May 2010 10:43:00 -0400

185 lines

Re: 5 passage culuture

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 May 2010 14:19:31 -0300

143 lines

New Thread

5 passages from ATCC

5 passages from ATCC

vivek nayak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 19:11:52 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

70% Isopropyl alcohol

70% Isopropyl alcohol

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 18 May 2010 16:55:18 -0400

59 lines

Re: 70% Isopropyl alcohol

Shaun Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 14:52:49 +0200

139 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 10 May 2010 16:51:30 +0200

62 lines

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 May 2010 09:40:19 +0530

157 lines

New Thread

animal derived peptone versus vegetable derived for use in rinsing solutions?

animal derived peptone versus vegetable derived for use in rinsing solutions?

Labore Jim - Portsmouth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 16:05:28 -0400

70 lines

Re: animal derived peptone versus vegetable derived for use in rinsing solutions?

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:49:09 -0400

138 lines

Re: animal derived peptone versus vegetable derived for use in rinsing solutions?

sheshagiri koppal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 23:14:19 +0100

121 lines

Re: animal derived peptone versus vegetable derived for use in rinsing solutions?

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 14:24:22 +0100

189 lines

New Thread

antimicrobial effectiveness

antimicrobial effectiveness

razia moorad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 02:49:01 -0700

62 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

Todd Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 13:34:20 -0500

149 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:29:12 -0400

193 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 16:44:30 -0400

144 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

razia moorad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 23:17:53 -0700

203 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

razia moorad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 23:23:17 -0700

147 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:27:40 -0400

118 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

Nilkantha Banerjee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 16:41:20 -1200

119 lines

Re: antimicrobial effectiveness

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 23:05:25 +0600

65 lines

New Thread

AOAC COUNTING RULES?

AOAC COUNTING RULES?

ST <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 18:42:55 +0700

70 lines

Re: AOAC COUNTING RULES?

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 08:04:15 -0700

90 lines

AOAC COUNTING RULES?

ST <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:24:54 +0700

73 lines

Re: AOAC COUNTING RULES?

Nancy Tomoney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 18:45:02 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

aseptic process validation media transport

aseptic process validation media transport

Craig LaBarre <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 11:23:55 -0400

59 lines

Re: aseptic process validation media transport

Nancy Tomoney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 18:47:52 +0000

70 lines

Re: aseptic process validation media transport

vivek nayak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 17:41:38 -0700

120 lines

New Thread

ATCC Culture

Re: ATCC Culture

Satiesh Bansode <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:41:06 +0530

183 lines

Re: ATCC Culture

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:12:48 +0530

254 lines

New Thread

AW: [PMFLIST] rotation of chemicals for sanitation - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

AW: [PMFLIST] rotation of chemicals for sanitation - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Axel Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:11:48 +0200

159 lines

Re: AW: [PMFLIST] rotation of chemicals for sanitation - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Carole Genovesi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 08:36:11 -0700

230 lines

Re: AW: [PMFLIST] rotation of chemicals for sanitation - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Polarine, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 15:21:05 -0500

348 lines

Re: AW: [PMFLIST] rotation of chemicals for sanitation - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 21 May 2010 09:01:19 +0530

336 lines

New Thread

AW: [PMFLIST] Test for skin flora - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

AW: [PMFLIST] Test for skin flora - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Axel Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 16:09:05 +0200

184 lines

New Thread

Basic Degree in Microbiology

Basic Degree in Microbiology

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 23:59:00 +0600

66 lines

Re: Basic Degree in Microbiology

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:07:18 -0400

123 lines

Re: Basic Degree in Microbiology

Denoya, Claudio D <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 09:31:45 -0400

154 lines

Re: Basic Degree in Microbiology

Tehseen Naqvi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 16:45:38 -0500

184 lines

Re: Basic Degree in Microbiology

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:25:44 +0200

271 lines

Re: Basic Degree in Microbiology

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:45:56 -0400

332 lines

Re: Basic Degree in Microbiology

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 07:12:17 -0700

426 lines

New Thread

Bioburden limits for API manufacturing

Bioburden limits for API manufacturing

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 12:13:32 -0400

66 lines

Re: Bioburden limits for API manufacturing

Brian Hatch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 16:50:35 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Bradyrhizobiaceae in water system - how to get rid of it?

Bradyrhizobiaceae in water system - how to get rid of it?

Alexandra Leung-Chiu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 15:37:49 -0500

81 lines

Re: Bradyrhizobiaceae in water system - how to get rid of it?

Teri C Soli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 21:59:01 -0400

168 lines

Re: Bradyrhizobiaceae in water system - how to get rid of it?

rama raju <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 19:59:29 +0530

221 lines

New Thread

Calculation of F0 Value

Calculation of F0 Value

NAIN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 23:09:27 -0700

56 lines

Re: Calculation of F0 Value

Nancy Tomoney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 20:51:10 +0000

73 lines

Re: Calculation of F0 Value

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 15:55:25 +0100

110 lines

Re: Calculation of F0 Value

Ice, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 11:06:27 -0400

185 lines

Re: Calculation of F0 Value

Riley, Cody <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 16:15:20 -0600

72 lines

New Thread

Call for papers (Fee-free article offer)

Call for papers (Fee-free article offer)

Archives of Clinical Microbiology <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 07:30:10 -0500

188 lines

New Thread

Candida rugosa

Candida rugosa

Boone, Jennifer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 16:38:56 -0400

75 lines

Re: Candida rugosa

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:01:38 -0400

148 lines

Re: Candida rugosa

Kerrigan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 19:10:51 -0400

152 lines

Re: Candida rugosa

V.Palani velan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 20:29:35 +0530

189 lines

New Thread

CCI test

CCI test

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 May 2010 17:07:22 +0530

72 lines

New Thread

Cell bank testing

Re: Cell bank testing

Kerrigan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:24:50 -0400

127 lines

New Thread

Centrifuging in non-sterile bottles

Centrifuging in non-sterile bottles

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 09:07:27 -0700

69 lines

Re: Centrifuging in non-sterile bottles

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 14:34:24 -0400

141 lines

Re: Centrifuging in non-sterile bottles

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:43:02 -0400

149 lines

Re: Centrifuging in non-sterile bottles

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 16:39:27 -0400

127 lines

New Thread

Cleaning procedures requalification

Cleaning procedures requalification

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 May 2010 14:42:28 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

Cleaning validation

Cleaning validation

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 20 May 2010 18:48:56 -0400

61 lines

Re: Cleaning validation

Kalyan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 21:01:48 +0530

123 lines

Re: Cleaning validation

Steve Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 08:55:40 -0700

133 lines

Re: Cleaning validation

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 21 May 2010 13:24:35 -0400

162 lines

Re: Cleaning validation

Steve Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 10:57:48 -0700

117 lines

Cleaning validation

Polarine, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 18:06:44 -0500

140 lines

Re: Cleaning validation

Frank Settineri <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 05:48:01 -0700

134 lines

New Thread

Cleanroom Event

Cleanroom Event

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 May 2010 11:15:51 -0500

56 lines

Re: Cleanroom Event

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 May 2010 09:10:26 +0200

135 lines

New Thread

Compressed Air Sampling

Re: Compressed Air Sampling

Khojema Ratlamwala <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 17:03:53 +0530

222 lines

Re: Compressed Air Sampling

DRANILFOKMARE <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 07:58:22 -0000

459 lines

Re: Compressed Air Sampling

shikher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 09:54:04 +0530

276 lines

New Thread

Conservation of A. brasilensis

Re: Conservation of A. brasilensis

Wekhande, Vaishnavi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:44:55 -0700

301 lines

Re: Conservation of A. brasilensis

suzan candarof <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 04:21:58 -0700

175 lines

Re: Conservation of A. brasilensis

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 12:54:56 -0700

181 lines

Re: Conservation of A. brasilensis

Cosmetic Fashion Calidad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 15:16:02 -0500

257 lines

Re: Conservation of A. brasilensis

Zankhana Bhatt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:18:34 -0700

253 lines

Re: Conservation of A. brasilensis

Veer Reddy Kovvuri <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 21:59:14 +0530

72 lines

New Thread

container closure integrity testing

container closure integrity testing

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:52:28 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Control and uncntrol area

Control and uncntrol area

kamlesh sheladia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 21:07:10 +0530

61 lines

New Thread

Customer audits

Customer audits

Agnieszka McAndrew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 12:18:06 +1200

72 lines

Re: Customer audits

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:15:21 -0400

169 lines

Re: Customer audits

Kathleen Baxter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:22:48 -0400

159 lines

Re: Customer audits

Dale Kelley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 19:40:34 -0700

144 lines

New Thread

Efficacy guidelines for Veterinary Disinfectant

Efficacy guidelines for Veterinary Disinfectant

Charu Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:54:34 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

EM isolates and micro investigation

EM isolates and micro investigation

renee neff <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 10:45:17 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

endotoxin standard curve

endotoxin standard curve

Trang B <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:26:32 -0700

57 lines

Re: endotoxin standard curve

Guy David - Wokingham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 13:35:24 +0200

140 lines

Re: endotoxin standard curve

Baines Alan - Wokingham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 14:33:39 +0200

151 lines

Re: endotoxin standard curve

Balaji S (Microbiology) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 06:34:57 +0530

118 lines

Re: endotoxin standard curve

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 07:50:57 +0600

55 lines

New Thread

Environmental monitoring

Environmental monitoring

EVLNRAO Mannem <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 20:34:28 +0530

62 lines

Re: Environmental monitoring

rama raju <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 19:46:35 +0530

117 lines

Re: Environmental monitoring

NAINESH KUMAR DWIVEDI <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 09:17:04 +0530

122 lines

Re: Environmental monitoring

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 14:40:20 -0400

170 lines

Re: Environmental monitoring

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 17:53:18 -0400

236 lines

Re: Environmental monitoring

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 17:54:56 -0400

242 lines

Re: Environmental monitoring

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 10:23:08 -0400

294 lines

Re: Environmental monitoring

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:50:18 -0400

134 lines

New Thread

Environmental Monitoring Software

Environmental Monitoring Software

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:16:22 -0500

55 lines

Re: Environmental Monitoring Software

Robert Lutskus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 15:38:37 -0400

134 lines

New Thread

EO residuals

EO residuals

Emily Cheah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 10:36:02 +0800

137 lines

New Thread

Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 18:18:02 -0400

63 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:40:35 -0400

174 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 07:27:26 -0700

251 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Erickson, Marianne C. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:35:43 -0500

234 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:55:00 -0400

248 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Trang B <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:32:21 -0700

239 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 07:40:03 -0400

353 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 08:04:29 -0400

320 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 07:28:00 -0700

415 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Stone, John H. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 11:43:26 -0400

419 lines

Re: Expected rate of environmental monitoring excursions

Aaron Fielder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 08:39:52 +1000

344 lines

New Thread

Fumigation in Microbiology lab

Fumigation in Microbiology lab

Polarine, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:59:22 -0500

80 lines

Re: Fumigation in Microbiology lab

rama raju <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:38:15 +0530

161 lines

Re: Fumigation in Microbiology lab

JAMAL>>>OPERATION>>>SPI <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 08:43:07 +0300

80 lines

Re: Fumigation in Microbiology lab

Kiran Gollapudi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2010 09:03:00 +0530

57 lines

Re: Fumigation in Microbiology lab

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 07:52:45 -0600

118 lines

Re: Fumigation in Microbiology lab

sirisha <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 08:51:34 +0530

184 lines

Re: Fumigation in Microbiology lab

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 12:37:25 -0600

145 lines

Re: Fumigation in Microbiology lab

Art Vellutato, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 21:59:26 -0400

137 lines

New Thread

fungi contamination in TSA and SCDA

fungi contamination in TSA and SCDA

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 07:57:17 +0700

64 lines

Re: fungi contamination in TSA and SCDA

SABA MUSTIKHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 09:29:37 -0700

88 lines

Re: fungi contamination in TSA and SCDA

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 22 May 2010 13:00:50 +0700

230 lines

New Thread

Fw: [PMFLIST] Media Expiration and Use By date

Re: Fw: [PMFLIST] Media Expiration and Use By date

derek freeman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:53:06 +0000

392 lines

New Thread

Fw: [PMFLIST] Media Expiration date

Fw: [PMFLIST] Media Expiration date

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 18 May 2010 16:58:08 +0200

265 lines

New Thread

Grow promotion test with Bacteroides vulgatus

Grow promotion test with Bacteroides vulgatus

Julieta Bonnin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 22:47:00 +0000

72 lines

Re: Grow promotion test with Bacteroides vulgatus

Julie Schwedock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 13:22:05 -0400

131 lines

New Thread

Growth Promotion with Environmental Isolates

Re: Growth Promotion with Environmental Isolates

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:47:39 -0400

230 lines

Re: Growth Promotion with Environmental Isolates

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:31:36 -0400

254 lines

Re: Growth Promotion with Environmental Isolates

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 11:20:51 -0500

253 lines

Re: Growth Promotion with Environmental Isolates

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:28:09 -0700

159 lines

New Thread

Help needed - identification of contaminant

Re: Help needed - identification of contaminant

jim achmoody <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 14:04:27 -0700

144 lines

Re: Help needed - identification of contaminant

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 07:55:58 -0700

70 lines

Re: Help needed - identification of contaminant

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 12:26:04 +0200

241 lines

Re: Help needed - identification of contaminant

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 11:43:41 -0700

300 lines

New Thread

Hydrolysates and endotoxin testing

Hydrolysates and endotoxin testing

Susanna Pyatkovskaya <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 11:32:20 -0400

85 lines

New Thread

Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

kpotts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:42:36 -0400

68 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

Todd Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 10:51:54 -0500

136 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 07:22:23 -0400

120 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

Balaji S (Microbiology) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 09:27:43 +0530

131 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 14:39:14 -0400

198 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 16:08:28 -0400

212 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

Todd Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 15:52:58 -0500

266 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 18:01:43 -0400

187 lines

Re: Identifying growth when its under the USP limits

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 18:03:18 -0400

179 lines

New Thread

incubator versus show case

incubator versus show case

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 22 May 2010 13:25:55 +0700

64 lines

New Thread

IV Bag Filling

IV Bag Filling

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 20 May 2010 15:12:09 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

Lecithin/tween20

Lecithin/tween20

Syed Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 15:07:35 -0400

53 lines

Re: Lecithin/tween20

suzan candarof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 06:20:01 -0700

127 lines

New Thread

Lipase production problem

Lipase production problem

ire francis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 02:42:49 -0700

58 lines

Re: Lipase production problem

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 13 May 2010 15:07:02 -0400

147 lines

Re: Lipase production problem

Frank Settineri <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 05:35:08 -0700

127 lines

Re: Lipase production problem

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 08:08:44 -0700

196 lines

Re: Lipase production problem

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 12:08:50 +0200

214 lines

New Thread

media and sample viscosity

media and sample viscosity

renee neff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 10:31:26 -0400

58 lines

Re: media and sample viscosity

ST <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 10:58:52 +0700

119 lines

New Thread

Media Expiration date

Media Expiration date

Jesusa Abad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 11:42:31 -0400

66 lines

Re: Media Expiration date

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 11:29:31 -0400

128 lines

Re: Media Expiration date

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 10 May 2010 16:45:03 +0100

142 lines

Re: Media Expiration date

Johanna Whelehan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 08:36:16 +0100

134 lines

Re: Media Expiration date

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 12:05:52 -0600

190 lines

Re: Media Expiration date

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 May 2010 09:36:09 +0530

220 lines

Re: Media Expiration date

VJ Sajjanadhasan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2010 12:11:49 +0530

96 lines

New Thread

Microbial Air Sampler Vaidation.

Microbial Air Sampler Vaidation.

Christopher Cumming <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 13:57:39 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

mold action level in EM

mold action level in EM

Trang B <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:13:49 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

Monitoring Sterility Test Incubators

Monitoring Sterility Test Incubators

Saravan kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 16:55:41 +0530

60 lines

Re: Monitoring Sterility Test Incubators

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 13:50:29 -0400

122 lines

Re: Monitoring Sterility Test Incubators

DRANILFOKMARE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 11:16:32 -0000

161 lines

New Thread

Neutralization of Azithromycin dihydrate

Neutralization of Azithromycin dihydrate

Omar Faruq <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2010 16:40:17 +0600

56 lines

New Thread

Number of Total Air Particle sites required per room from the ISO system

Number of Total Air Particle sites required per room from the ISO system

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 14:16:30 -0700

73 lines

Re: Number of Total Air Particle sites required per room from the ISO system

avadhesh patidar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 09:42:19 -0700

138 lines

New Thread

Odor testing in Process Water/

Odor testing in Process Water/

Carole Genovesi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 15:51:46 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Out of Specification in microbiology

Out of Specification in microbiology

Capua, CQB <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2010 16:14:57 +0200

90 lines

Re: Out of Specification in microbiology

Julie Barlasov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 23:38:03 -0400

157 lines

Re: Out of Specification in microbiology

Frank Settineri <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 05:46:29 -0700

154 lines

Re: Out of Specification in microbiology

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 11:46:59 -0400

296 lines

Re: Out of Specification in microbiology

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:16:48 -0400

119 lines

New Thread

PDA Technical Document #13 Fundamentals of an EM Program

PDA Technical Document #13 Fundamentals of an EM Program

Brian Hatch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 16:23:18 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

plate 2 plate variation

plate 2 plate variation

sankar naryanan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 07:19:58 +0530

57 lines

Re: plate 2 plate variation

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 10:49:18 -0300

137 lines

Re: plate 2 plate variation

Abu tameem Mohd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 19:06:42 +0400

206 lines

Re: plate 2 plate variation

Amanda Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 08:44:12 +0200

201 lines

Re: plate 2 plate variation

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 08:49:42 -0700

278 lines

Re: plate 2 plate variation

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 14:40:58 -0300

290 lines

Re: plate 2 plate variation

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 14:17:32 -0400

378 lines

New Thread

PRESERVATIVE

PRESERVATIVE

Syed Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 12:22:54 -0400

64 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 May 2010 15:01:46 +0200

143 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 15:35:54 +0100

77 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

JAMAL>>>OPERATION>>>SPI <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 16:45:55 +0300

125 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 May 2010 10:25:52 -0400

147 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 13:17:23 -0400

184 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

Fabiola Echegaray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 18:54:36 -0500

197 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

V.Palani velan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 20:35:51 +0530

234 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 08:48:17 -0400

302 lines

Re: PRESERVATIVE

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 17:34:58 -0400

312 lines

New Thread

preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

ramalingam Sridhar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 01:10:45 -0700

73 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Julie Barlasov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 13:41:24 -0400

141 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 20:11:48 +0100

137 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 16:48:14 -0400

212 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Hogan, Isabel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 12:00:53 +0100

225 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 07:40:28 -0400

288 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Brous, Isabelle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 15:59:34 -0400

305 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Fausto Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 09:29:18 +0200

418 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 10:14:58 -0400

368 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 10:34:03 -0400

357 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Brous, Isabelle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 11:07:09 -0400

460 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 11:50:37 -0400

375 lines

Re: preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 09:11:00 -0400

102 lines

New Thread

Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

Vestby, Jann (GE Healthcare) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 13:27:09 +0200

65 lines

Re: Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 17:52:37 -0400

122 lines

Re: Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

Vestby, Jann (GE Healthcare) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 15:48:19 +0200

185 lines

Re: Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 16:09:30 -0400

243 lines

Re: Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 17:00:35 -0400

245 lines

Re: Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

EHOU (Ellen Brunbech) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 08:48:38 +0200

239 lines

Re: Problems with growth promotion of Staph. aureus

Katz, Harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 14:58:30 -0400

123 lines

New Thread

problems with the absense test of E.coli in antidepressants

problems with the absense test of E.coli in antidepressants

Kraan, J <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 11:21:33 +0200

84 lines

Re: problems with the absense test of E.coli in antidepressants

luis soares <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2010 19:25:06 +0100

152 lines

Re: problems with the absense test of E.coli in antidepressants

Kraan, J <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 16:13:42 +0200

220 lines

New Thread

Process simulation

Process simulation

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 12 May 2010 16:51:20 +0530

93 lines

Re: Process simulation

Julie Barlasov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 23:50:20 -0400

172 lines

New Thread

Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Brinkman, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 04:44:33 -0700

58 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Gewalt Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 09:59:47 -0500

132 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Estepp, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 08:39:43 -0400

124 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Estepp, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:37:07 -0400

200 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 24 May 2010 10:34:57 -0700

139 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Brinkman, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:09:25 -0700

200 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Gewalt Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:57:22 -0500

268 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Kirk Douglas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 10:36:20 -0400

254 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 06:44:42 -0700

72 lines

Re: Pyrogen-Free Serological Pipets

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 09:15:43 -0500

211 lines

New Thread

Quality Management System of the Laboratory

Quality Management System of the Laboratory

Raymond Leiber-TRL <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 13:43:46 -0400

86 lines

Re: Quality Management System of the Laboratory

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:54 +0200

182 lines

Re: Quality Management System of the Laboratory

Dale Kelley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 06:54:13 -0700

151 lines

New Thread

R: [PMFLIST] Number of Total Air Particle sites required per room from the ISO system

R: [PMFLIST] Number of Total Air Particle sites required per room from the ISO system

Pietro Gmail <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 17:39:15 +0200

258 lines

New Thread

R: [PMFLIST] Out of Specification in microbiology

R: [PMFLIST] Out of Specification in microbiology

Capua, CQB <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 10:54:15 +0200

223 lines

Re: R: [PMFLIST] Out of Specification in microbiology

Frank Settineri <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2010 05:41:49 -0700

289 lines

New Thread

rotation of chemicals for sanitation

rotation of chemicals for sanitation

McGrady, Travis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 12:43:40 -0400

62 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Ravi Moorthy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 09:00:14 +0530

119 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 11:41:35 -0400

172 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Steve Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 08:57:38 -0700

153 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Robert Lamm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 13:18:36 -0400

273 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Dr Tony Breeze <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2010 13:20:25 +0100

65 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 07:50:15 -0400

117 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Wills, Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 15:59:46 +0200

203 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Jose E. Martinez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 18:05:50 -0400

238 lines

Re: rotation of chemicals for sanitation

Charu Joshi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 02:15:13 -0700

156 lines

New Thread

RV: [PMFLIST] preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

RV: [PMFLIST] preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2010 14:53:31 -0300

148 lines

Re: RV: [PMFLIST] preservative effectiveness test for oral solids

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 17 May 2010 11:06:47 -0400

315 lines

New Thread

Sample Dilutions

Sample Dilutions

Sewell, Tabatha <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 09:05:02 -0500

78 lines

Re: Sample Dilutions

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 16:19:02 -0400

149 lines

Re: Sample Dilutions

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 16:19:35 -0400

150 lines

New Thread

solid Cfu calculation versus liquid cfu calculation

Re: solid Cfu calculation versus liquid cfu calculation

renee neff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 May 2010 10:54:44 -0400

81 lines

New Thread

supp.

supp.

Ebrahim galal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 09:11:15 -0700

56 lines

Re: supp.

Fausto Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 13:57:31 +0200

149 lines

Re: supp.

Todd Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 08:33:22 -0500

144 lines

Re: supp.

IBRAHIM HASHIM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 23:00:05 -0700

120 lines

Re: supp.

Sarah Verelst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 08:56:29 +0200

184 lines

Re: supp.

Klein, Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 10:59:13 -0400

266 lines

Re: supp.

Carina Seba <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 15:27:25 -0300

265 lines

Re: supp.

Sarah Verelst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 14:58:42 +0200

312 lines

New Thread

Test for skin flora

Test for skin flora

R Thijssen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 14:39:35 +0200

69 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 4 May 2010 11:03:40 -0700

167 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 08:43:06 -0300

156 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2010 06:47:59 -0700

213 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Kirk Douglas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 12:15:03 -0400

262 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Kirk Douglas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 12:17:46 -0400

222 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Kirk Douglas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2010 13:29:19 -0400

54 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Nancy Tomoney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 13:54:51 +0000

67 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Steve Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 10:35:33 -0700

149 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Tarun K Chugh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 16:01:18 -0000

392 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2010 14:32:59 +0100

58 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 13:46:05 -0400

115 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Anne Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2010 12:03:04 -0400

123 lines

Re: Test for skin flora

Laurie Fife <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 10:38:38 -0400

130 lines

New Thread

Trying to find lost microbiologist

Trying to find lost microbiologist

Villa, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2010 08:08:33 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

TSA compare to SCDA

TSA compare to SCDA

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 07:57:17 +0700

67 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 May 2010 16:56:55 -0400

151 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

Fry Robert A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 07:01:21 -0500

147 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 17:27:02 -0400

133 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2010 17:44:48 -0400

139 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

AOL <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 10:12:47 -0400

210 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 22 May 2010 13:15:54 +0700

309 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 22 May 2010 13:20:54 +0700

226 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 22 May 2010 13:20:54 +0700

219 lines

Re: TSA compare to SCDA

Katz, Harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:50:23 -0400

263 lines

New Thread

Urgent Help needed @ use of SDA w/o Antibiotics

Urgent Help needed @ use of SDA w/o Antibiotics

Raja Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 10:12:02 -0700

94 lines

Re: Urgent Help needed @ use of SDA w/o Antibiotics

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 11:04:17 -0400

139 lines

Re: Urgent Help needed @ use of SDA w/o Antibiotics

mohamed daoud <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2010 22:18:54 +0300

69 lines

New Thread

use of sab dex with antibiotics

use of sab dex with antibiotics

renee neff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2010 11:17:39 -0400

62 lines

Re: use of sab dex with antibiotics

Julie Barlasov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2010 09:30:36 -0400

133 lines

New Thread

Use of SDA with antibiotics

Use of SDA with antibiotics

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 18 May 2010 12:17:08 +0530

67 lines

New Thread

USP <81>

USP <81>

Tavares, Leslie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 18:23:57 -0400

84 lines

New Thread

UV light effect in dynamic passboxs.

UV light effect in dynamic passboxs.

rama raju <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2010 19:31:33 +0530

54 lines

Re: UV light effect in dynamic passboxs.

JAMAL>>>OPERATION>>>SPI <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 09:43:12 +0300

121 lines

New Thread

validation of cryopreserved strains

validation of cryopreserved strains

silvana celis barrios <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 12:45:29 -0500

73 lines

Re: validation of cryopreserved strains

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 27 May 2010 08:34:29 -0400

153 lines

New Thread

Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Atul Deshmukh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2010 17:42:35 +0530

111 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2010 14:03:01 -0400

163 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2010 08:20:26 -0700

245 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 22 May 2010 14:05:52 +0530

340 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 07:59:37 -0400

400 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 19:31:52 +0200

294 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Robert Lamm <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2010 17:24:07 -0400

382 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 08:18:25 -0400

355 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 13:24:47 -0700

422 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2010 22:39:02 +0200

451 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Mertens, Frank <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 07:34:39 +0200

186 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2010 12:39:45 -0400

235 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 26 May 2010 13:42:18 -0400

90 lines

Re: Validation of kit for identification of gram negative bacteria

Darshan Kharote <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2010 06:01:03 +0200

238 lines

New Thread

Validation of Surface Monitoring Procedure

Re: Validation of Surface Monitoring Procedure

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:30:32 +0600

56 lines

Re: Validation of Surface Monitoring Procedure

Dr. Kirby Farrington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2010 15:13:30 -0400

183 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.MICROBIOLOGYNETWORK.COM

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager