LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PMFLIST Archives


PMFLIST Archives

PMFLIST Archives


October 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<No subject> (1 message)
Acceptance criteria for microbiological quality (2 messages)
Antibiotics microbial assays: Neomycin interferes in Polymyxin (1 message)
Autoclavable Neutraliser for Peroxide / Peracetic Acid Streilant Carry Over (3 messages)
AW: [PMFLIST] Disinfectant - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (1 message)
bacterial endotoxins (4 messages)
BET on concentrate dialysate (3 messages)
BET testing alternatives (6 messages)
Bile-Tolerant Gram Negative Bacteria (1 message)
biofilm in water (20 messages)
BIOFILM Quantification (3 messages)
Clean room classification standards and disagreements... (1 message)
Coliform (2 messages)
Contract Lab Inquiry (1 message)
Detection Limit of <1cfu/mL for MLT (1 message)
Disinfectant (4 messages)
ENDOTOXIN CALCULATIONS (3 messages)
Endotoxins and interaction (2 messages)
ETO sterility test (1 message)
FDA Warning Letter to Gilead Sciences (Most items microbial or aseptic processing related) (1 message)
finished dosage form (1 message)
FORMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS (2 messages)
Fungas in water (2 messages)
Fw: nonviable monitoring (4 messages)
FW: Validation of Isolators (1 message)
Fwd: (1 message)
Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (1 message)
Gel Clot Alert/Action Levels for WFI (3 messages)
GPT (8 messages)
Handswabbing procedures for OOT results (1 message)
how much quantity of sample for sterility testing (4 messages)
Inactive virus removal by HEPAs (2 messages)
Inhibition of Staph. Aureus in Tryptic Soy broth in polyethylene containers? (2 messages)
Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth (7 messages)
Inhibitory property testing of media (1 message)
Issues with Biolog Media (5 messages)
Lactobacillus/Acidophilus recovery on the Soleris Units (1 message)
Latest PMF Newsletter (1 message)
Log reduction calculation reg (4 messages)
Micro testing on finished product (4 messages)
Microbiologist Position Opening (1 message)
minimum number of thermocouple /data logger will be used for sterilizer validation (3 messages)
Norfloxacin tablets (4 messages)
PET testing (1 message)
Possibility on Put Autoclave on Micro Work Area (besides Biosafety Cabinet) (2 messages)
Product bioburden, (1 message)
Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA (7 messages)
Reducing the number of EM sites (3 messages)
Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions (10 messages)
Seek for Lab to perform Biological Reactivity Test <87> (4 messages)
Shortening Incubation period on TAMC for Non-Sterile Pharmaceutical Products (1 message)
Sterility Failure (3 messages)
Sterility test repeat (10 messages)
Sterility test washing cycle (4 messages)
Sterilized 80% Glycerol - Shelf life (2 messages)
Survival of organisms on stainless steel surfaces (4 messages)
USP <1111> Interpretation Survey (9 messages)
USP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery (you have 1000 CFU and dilute 2-fold to get 1 CFU?) (4 messages)
USP Identification (2 messages)
validation of camera to take pictures of gram stains, etc (3 messages)
validity and stability of microbiological results (5 messages)
VRBGA+ Lactose (4 messages)
[SPAM] [PMFLIST] FORMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS (1 message)
[SPAM] [PMFLIST] how much quantity of sample for sterility testing (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PMFLIST Home

PMFLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Rajya Vardhan Arya <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:08:08 -0700

165 lines

New Thread

Acceptance criteria for microbiological quality

Acceptance criteria for microbiological quality

Aaron Fielder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:18:46 +1000

107 lines

Re: Acceptance criteria for microbiological quality

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:14:23 -0400

176 lines

New Thread

Antibiotics microbial assays: Neomycin interferes in Polymyxin

Re: Antibiotics microbial assays: Neomycin interferes in Polymyxin

Sebastián Rodríguez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:00:15 -0300

187 lines

New Thread

Autoclavable Neutraliser for Peroxide / Peracetic Acid Streilant Carry Over

Autoclavable Neutraliser for Peroxide / Peracetic Acid Streilant Carry Over

derek freeman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:32:35 +0000

86 lines

Re: Autoclavable Neutraliser for Peroxide / Peracetic Acid Streilant Carry Over

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:49:17 -0300

167 lines

Re: Autoclavable Neutraliser for Peroxide / Peracetic Acid Streilant Carry Over

Tony A. Rook <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:55:02 -0400

161 lines

New Thread

AW: [PMFLIST] Disinfectant - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

AW: [PMFLIST] Disinfectant - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Axel Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:14:09 +0200

193 lines

New Thread

bacterial endotoxins

bacterial endotoxins

vrspotluri <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:20:47 +0530

65 lines

Re: bacterial endotoxins

Deepak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:19:10 -0000

192 lines

Re: bacterial endotoxins

Baines Alan - Slough <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:47:16 +0200

167 lines

Re: bacterial endotoxins

Sara Sevillano <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:05:52 +0200

238 lines

New Thread

BET on concentrate dialysate

BET on concentrate dialysate

SP Chin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:53:22 +0800

66 lines

Re: BET on concentrate dialysate

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:28:15 -0300

154 lines

Re: BET on concentrate dialysate

Laurie Fife <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:03:20 -0400

140 lines

New Thread

BET testing alternatives

BET testing alternatives

Mohammad Yousffi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:58:45 -0400

65 lines

Re: BET testing alternatives

Polk, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:44:04 -0400

91 lines

Re: BET testing alternatives

Guy David - Slough <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:44:35 +0200

141 lines

Re: BET testing alternatives

Kirk Douglas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:11:49 -0400

202 lines

Re: BET testing alternatives

Nicoline Bæk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:02:50 +0200

188 lines

Re: BET testing alternatives

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:11:34 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

Bile-Tolerant Gram Negative Bacteria

Bile-Tolerant Gram Negative Bacteria

Julie Young <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:27:16 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

biofilm in water

Re: biofilm in water

Olja Cikic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:54:53 +0200

216 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Olja Cikic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:28:57 +0200

234 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:29:10 -0500

137 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Mark Fornalik <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:54:12 -0400

179 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Elaine Gardener <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:15:33 +0100

225 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Clontz, L.M. (Lucia) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:28:23 -0400

130 lines

Re: biofilm in water

John Brecker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:56:10 -0400

188 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Tzvety Ilieva <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:39:45 +0300

120 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Albert, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 07:08:33 -0500

306 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Teri C Soli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:20:23 -0400

269 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Fiona Lynch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:48:10 +0200

368 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:29:10 -0400

266 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Olja Cikic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:28:57 -0400

412 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Olja Cikic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:54:53 -0400

384 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Clontz, L.M. (Lucia) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:28:23 -0400

255 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Olja Cikic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:54:53 -0400

383 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Piccolo, Sandra R. [CONBR] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:26:41 -0300

325 lines

Re: biofilm in water

karen garcia <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 15:36:36 +0800

297 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Raj kishore <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:53:56 -0000

385 lines

Re: biofilm in water

Dick, Andrew [CPCUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:50:51 -0400

449 lines

New Thread

BIOFILM Quantification

BIOFILM Quantification

Elaine Gardener <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:19:06 -0700

58 lines

Re: BIOFILM Quantification

Mark Fornalik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:15:16 -0400

156 lines

Re: BIOFILM Quantification

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:24:05 -0700

146 lines

New Thread

Clean room classification standards and disagreements...

Clean room classification standards and disagreements...

Nicoline Bæk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:52:00 +0200

104 lines

New Thread

Coliform

Coliform

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:32:31 -0400

60 lines

Re: Coliform

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:42:39 -0400

144 lines

New Thread

Contract Lab Inquiry

Contract Lab Inquiry

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:20:38 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

Detection Limit of <1cfu/mL for MLT

Detection Limit of <1cfu/mL for MLT

Jody O'Grady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:40:35 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Disinfectant

Disinfectant

Rupesh Sinha <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 14:40:08 +0530

67 lines

Disinfectant

Rupesh Sinha <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 05:10:08 -0400

169 lines

Re: Disinfectant

tadimeti bhanu <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 19:51:08 +0530

127 lines

Re: Disinfectant

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:13:56 -0400

265 lines

New Thread

ENDOTOXIN CALCULATIONS

ENDOTOXIN CALCULATIONS

Sara Sevillano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:34:15 +0200

68 lines

Re: ENDOTOXIN CALCULATIONS

Laurie Fife <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:59:09 -0400

169 lines

Re: ENDOTOXIN CALCULATIONS

Laurie Fife <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:59:02 -0400

165 lines

New Thread

Endotoxins and interaction

Endotoxins and interaction

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:43:07 +0200

99 lines

Re: Endotoxins and interaction

Laurie Fife <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:59:30 -0400

179 lines

New Thread

ETO sterility test

ETO sterility test

VijayaKumar R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:23:17 +0530

67 lines

New Thread

FDA Warning Letter to Gilead Sciences (Most items microbial or aseptic processing related)

FDA Warning Letter to Gilead Sciences (Most items microbial or aseptic processing related)

Balkovic, Ed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:49:03 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

finished dosage form

finished dosage form

rosa baumgarten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:13:10 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

FORMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

FORMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Tea Maglakelidze <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:00:42 +0400

63 lines

Re: FORMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:40:32 -0400

127 lines

New Thread

Fungas in water

Fungas in water

mona khan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:55:57 -0700

58 lines

Re: Fungas in water

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:12:53 -0400

175 lines

New Thread

Fw: nonviable monitoring

Fw: nonviable monitoring

REHAM SAEED <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:42:50 -0700

58 lines

Re: Fw: nonviable monitoring

Ravi Moorthy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:57:42 +0530

139 lines

Fw: nonviable monitoring

REHAM SAEED <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:42:50 -0400

182 lines

Re: Fw: nonviable monitoring

Gerges,Mody <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:19:48 -0400

139 lines

New Thread

FW: Validation of Isolators

Re: FW: Validation of Isolators

Ravi Talluri <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:36:18 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

Fwd:

Fwd:

Rajya Vardhan Arya <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:34:33 -0700

60 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:45:53 -0400

165 lines

New Thread

Gel Clot Alert/Action Levels for WFI

Re: Gel Clot Alert/Action Levels for WFI

rakesh modi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:20:56 +0530

112 lines

Re: Gel Clot Alert/Action Levels for WFI

Saif Al-Din N. Barqawi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:01:39 +0300

195 lines

Re: Gel Clot Alert/Action Levels for WFI

Sushil Bhardwaj <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 06:43:42 -0700

181 lines

New Thread

GPT

GPT

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:08:31 -0400

69 lines

GPT

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:03:48 -0400

119 lines

GPT

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:02:52 -0400

168 lines

Re: GPT

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:03:51 -0300

264 lines

Re: GPT

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:08:21 -0400

332 lines

Re: GPT

Jodi Beaudry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:24:50 -0500

335 lines

Re: GPT

Todd Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:28:33 -0500

443 lines

Re: GPT

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:14:51 -0300

418 lines

New Thread

Handswabbing procedures for OOT results

Handswabbing procedures for OOT results

Amanda Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:42:18 +0200

125 lines

New Thread

how much quantity of sample for sterility testing

how much quantity of sample for sterility testing

ankur goyal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:55:50 -0700

58 lines

Re: how much quantity of sample for sterility testing

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:07:07 +0100

112 lines

Re: how much quantity of sample for sterility testing

Lohr,John,FORT WORTH,R&D <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:33:01 -0500

181 lines

Re: how much quantity of sample for sterility testing

Jitendra Chhibber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:52:43 -0500

137 lines

New Thread

Inactive virus removal by HEPAs

Inactive virus removal by HEPAs

David Page <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:48:04 +0100

82 lines

Re: Inactive virus removal by HEPAs

White, Edward K <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:16:12 -0500

150 lines

New Thread

Inhibition of Staph. Aureus in Tryptic Soy broth in polyethylene containers?

Inhibition of Staph. Aureus in Tryptic Soy broth in polyethylene containers?

EHOU (Ellen Brunbech) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:39:28 +0200

91 lines

Re: Inhibition of Staph. Aureus in Tryptic Soy broth in polyethylene containers?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:31:31 -0400

148 lines

New Thread

Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

Defterigou Olga <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:30:16 +0300

99 lines

Re: Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:23:27 +0000

85 lines

Re: Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:24:50 -0700

170 lines

Re: Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:06:56 +0200

257 lines

Re: Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:51:43 -0700

320 lines

Re: Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:09:03 +0100

381 lines

Re: Inhibitory property of Mac conkey broth

Baruch Pinnick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:38:25 +0200

80 lines

New Thread

Inhibitory property testing of media

Inhibitory property testing of media

Jodi Beaudry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:54:35 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Issues with Biolog Media

Issues with Biolog Media

Brinkman, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 05:10:08 -0700

61 lines

Re: Issues with Biolog Media

Michael Graebner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:00:20 -0400

50 lines

Re: Issues with Biolog Media

Jitendra Chhibber <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:47:18 -0500

120 lines

Re: Issues with Biolog Media

Wood, Patricia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:13:10 -0400

129 lines

Re: Issues with Biolog Media

Brinkman, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:04:47 -0700

109 lines

New Thread

Lactobacillus/Acidophilus recovery on the Soleris Units

Lactobacillus/Acidophilus recovery on the Soleris Units

LJ <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:50:34 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

Latest PMF Newsletter

Latest PMF Newsletter

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:54:22 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

Log reduction calculation reg

Log reduction calculation reg

Karthi keyan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:56:07 -0000

78 lines

Re: Log reduction calculation reg

Anne Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:42:07 -0400

168 lines

Re: Log reduction calculation reg

Paul Priscott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:34:48 +1000

166 lines

Re: Log reduction calculation reg

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:10:18 -0600

226 lines

New Thread

Micro testing on finished product

Micro testing on finished product

Christine M Kodlubanski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:43:43 -0500

80 lines

Re: Micro testing on finished product

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:39:58 +0100

85 lines

Re: Micro testing on finished product

Devendra Rawal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:45:13 -0700

86 lines

Re: Micro testing on finished product

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:30:38 +0100

199 lines

New Thread

Microbiologist Position Opening

Microbiologist Position Opening

McGuire, Jason <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:30:22 -0500

59 lines

New Thread

minimum number of thermocouple /data logger will be used for sterilizer validation

minimum number of thermocouple /data logger will be used for sterilizer validation

Hasanath <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 03:55:57 -0700

66 lines

Re: minimum number of thermocouple /data logger will be used for sterilizer validation

Devendra Rawal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:37:46 -0700

90 lines

Re: minimum number of thermocouple /data logger will be used for sterilizer validation

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:32:17 -0600

144 lines

New Thread

Norfloxacin tablets

Re: Norfloxacin tablets

Ashraf H. Aiesh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:47:34 +0300

146 lines

Re: Norfloxacin tablets

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:08:40 -0700

212 lines

Re: Norfloxacin tablets

Ashraf H. Aiesh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 04:47:34 -0400

281 lines

Re: Norfloxacin tablets

hemant ghadge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:18:32 -0000

395 lines

New Thread

PET testing

PET testing

Hogan, Isabel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:52:08 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

Possibility on Put Autoclave on Micro Work Area (besides Biosafety Cabinet)

Possibility on Put Autoclave on Micro Work Area (besides Biosafety Cabinet)

almando geraldi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:58:43 +0700

61 lines

Re: Possibility on Put Autoclave on Micro Work Area (besides Biosafety Cabinet)

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:15:14 -0400

128 lines

New Thread

Product bioburden,

Product bioburden,

Narendra kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:24:13 +0530

63 lines

New Thread

Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

Moe Sizlac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:47:01 -0700

64 lines

Re: Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

Donna Milazzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:35:09 -0700

151 lines

Re: Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:45:26 -0400

155 lines

Re: Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

fausto silva <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:56:03 +0200

168 lines

Re: Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:58:04 +0100

155 lines

Re: Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

Todd Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:48:52 -0500

179 lines

Re: Ps. aeruginosa TSA vs. PCA

Christopher Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:35:04 -0500

142 lines

New Thread

Reducing the number of EM sites

Reducing the number of EM sites

Susanna Pyatkovskaya <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:40:11 -0400

76 lines

Re: Reducing the number of EM sites

Steven G. Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:52:34 +0000

131 lines

Re: Reducing the number of EM sites

Kubicek, Marc F <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:02:16 -0400

143 lines

New Thread

Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Dawn McIver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:08:57 -0500

58 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:49:34 GMT

98 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:48:06 -0300

167 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:00:43 -0400

171 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Stanley Alekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:44:05 -0400

285 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:30:38 -0400

356 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Dale Kelley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:37:19 -0700

132 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

silvana celis barrios <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:26:20 -0500

244 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:57:33 -0400

400 lines

Re: Rejecting Aseptic Product for EM Excursions

Katz, Harvey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:06:27 -0400

284 lines

New Thread

Seek for Lab to perform Biological Reactivity Test <87>

Seek for Lab to perform Biological Reactivity Test <87>

Kwok Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:11:29 -0700

58 lines

Re: Seek for Lab to perform Biological Reactivity Test <87>

Ely, Gordon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:52:21 -0500

159 lines

Re: Seek for Lab to perform Biological Reactivity Test <87>

Afsar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:13:42 +0530

121 lines

Re: Seek for Lab to perform Biological Reactivity Test <87>

Julie Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:54:02 -0400

193 lines

New Thread

Shortening Incubation period on TAMC for Non-Sterile Pharmaceutical Products

Shortening Incubation period on TAMC for Non-Sterile Pharmaceutical Products

almando geraldi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:16:43 +0700

66 lines

New Thread

Sterility Failure

Sterility Failure

Taiyab Ali <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:47:11 +0300

71 lines

Re: Sterility Failure

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:21:45 -0400

145 lines

Re: Sterility Failure

Carol Lampe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:44:03 -0500

126 lines

New Thread

Sterility test repeat

Re: Sterility test repeat

vrspotluri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:53:44 +0530

174 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:36:29 +0100

98 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

Dawn McIver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:24:07 -0500

238 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

Rupesh Sinha <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 10:44:32 +0530

253 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

mohan mate <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:28:07 +0530

97 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:59:53 -0700

298 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:50:28 -0400

186 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

mohan mate <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:53:28 +0530

138 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:26:56 -0400

396 lines

Re: Sterility test repeat

Carol Lampe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:30 -0500

127 lines

New Thread

Sterility test washing cycle

Sterility test washing cycle

Defterigou Olga <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:12:21 +0300

98 lines

Re: Sterility test washing cycle

Erisken, Serap F <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:16:21 -0500

311 lines

Re: Sterility test washing cycle

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:43:25 +0200

395 lines

Re: Sterility test washing cycle

Crowder, Dwanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:51:56 -0700

166 lines

New Thread

Sterilized 80% Glycerol - Shelf life

Sterilized 80% Glycerol - Shelf life

Christina Kerksieck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:05:17 -0700

76 lines

Re: Sterilized 80% Glycerol - Shelf life

Dr Tony Breeze <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:35:28 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Survival of organisms on stainless steel surfaces

Survival of organisms on stainless steel surfaces

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:44:27 +0100

67 lines

Re: Survival of organisms on stainless steel surfaces

Chris Salyer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:59:57 -0400

191 lines

Re: Survival of organisms on stainless steel surfaces

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:12:02 -0400

136 lines

Re: Survival of organisms on stainless steel surfaces

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:06:33 GMT

124 lines

New Thread

USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Anderson, Nathan [MCCUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:41:24 -0400

92 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:35:53 -0300

170 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Jitendra Chhibber <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:32:17 -0500

158 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Mike Schoonover <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:30:29 -0400

238 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:30:13 +0200

156 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Kwok Wu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:27:20 -0700

89 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Kramer, Kathy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:46:08 -0400

222 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Sebastián Rodríguez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:08:12 -0300

266 lines

Re: USP <1111> Interpretation Survey

Paul Priscott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:26:50 +1000

347 lines

New Thread

USP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery (you have 1000 CFU and dilute 2-fold to get 1 CFU?)

USP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery (you have 1000 CFU and dilute 2-fold to get 1 CFU?)

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:15:23 -0700

85 lines

Re: USP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery (you have 1000 CFU and dilute 2-fold to get 1 CFU?)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:27:02 -0400

140 lines

Re: USP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery (you have 1000 CFU and dilute 2-fold to get 1 CFU?)

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:12:55 -0400

148 lines

Re: USP <1227> Validation of Microbial Recovery (you have 1000 CFU and dilute 2-fold to get 1 CFU?)

Omkar nath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:53:05 +0530

149 lines

New Thread

USP Identification

USP Identification

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:40:03 -0400

98 lines

USP identification

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:43:23 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

validation of camera to take pictures of gram stains, etc

validation of camera to take pictures of gram stains, etc

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:45:36 -0400

75 lines

Re: validation of camera to take pictures of gram stains, etc

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:14:06 -0400

174 lines

Re: validation of camera to take pictures of gram stains, etc

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:36:03 -0400

148 lines

New Thread

validity and stability of microbiological results

validity and stability of microbiological results

Dolores Castro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:33:18 +0200

67 lines

Re: validity and stability of microbiological results

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:46:45 -0400

124 lines

Re: validity and stability of microbiological results

tadimeti bhanu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:18:43 +0530

121 lines

Re: validity and stability of microbiological results

Narendra kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:01:29 +0530

144 lines

Re: validity and stability of microbiological results

Wekhande, Vaishnavi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:12:17 -0700

124 lines

New Thread

VRBGA+ Lactose

VRBGA+ Lactose

Saeed Hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:54:42 -0400

59 lines

Re: VRBGA+ Lactose

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:11:16 -0400

112 lines

Re: VRBGA+ Lactose

Dabbara Venkateshwara Rao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:07:47 +0530

96 lines

Re: VRBGA+ Lactose

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:38:29 -0400

146 lines

New Thread

[SPAM] [PMFLIST] FORMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Re: [SPAM] [PMFLIST] FORMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Syed Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:31:16 -0400

123 lines

New Thread

[SPAM] [PMFLIST] how much quantity of sample for sterility testing

Re: [SPAM] [PMFLIST] how much quantity of sample for sterility testing

Syed Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:05:56 -0400

121 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.MICROBIOLOGYNETWORK.COM

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager