LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PMFLIST Archives


PMFLIST Archives

PMFLIST Archives


June 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<62> (1 message)
<No subject> (3 messages)
Acidified Bleach (4 messages)
Alternative for fumigation (4 messages)
Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing (26 messages)
Antimicrobial effectiveness testing - testing at 0 h (4 messages)
Antimicrobial effectiveness testing. (3 messages)
Aspergillus spore suspension (1 message)
AW: [PMFLIST] AW: [PMFLIST] Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (1 message)
AW: [PMFLIST] Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (1 message)
AW: [PMFLIST] Sterile dress used in classified areas - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (1 message)
Bacteria D and Z values (1 message)
chemical compatibility (1 message)
Chlorine dose in water system (5 messages)
Choice of media for autoclave validation runs (7 messages)
clean steam samplers (10 messages)
Commercially Purchased Ready-To-Use Media (3 messages)
Converting I.U. to micrograms for Gentamicin Sulfate (2 messages)
Designing a micro lab (6 messages)
EM mold isolate (4 messages)
Enumeration of probiotics (1 message)
FDA/CBER has a new Sterility Test (2 messages)
FW: FW: [PMFLIST] Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben. (2 messages)
Fw: ready Culture media (1 message)
FW: [PMFLIST] Choice of media for autoclave validation runs (4 messages)
Gentamicin residue removal (2 messages)
Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media (6 messages)
How to eliminate the chlorine effect in a microbiol ogical water sample (1 message)
How to eliminate the chlorine effect in a microbiological water sample (1 message)
Identification of microorganisms (2 messages)
In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media (11 messages)
Incubation Temperature for EM Plate (4 messages)
Not exactly a microbiology question but... (1 message)
OOS result (2 messages)
Particle Counters (1 message)
PMF list (1 message)
Practical demonstration on sterility test in Isolator (4 messages)
Pre-incubation EM Media (4 messages)
Preparatory testing of same raw material with different suppliers (5 messages)
Pseudomanas spp or Pseudomonas aeruginosa only? (1 message)
Question (1 message)
Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (2 messages)
Question regarding aseptic transfer of materials (4 messages)
Reg.Clostridium sporogenes analysis (1 message)
Reg.Env.monitoring (1 message)
REQUEST: Test Diluent System Emulsifier Comparison (1 message)
Responsible to initiate protocol (2 messages)
Seed Lot Technique and Five Passages for EM Isolates (3 messages)
Some micro queries. (4 messages)
Source of commerical isolates (1 message)
Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum (15 messages)
Sterile dress used in classified areas (2 messages)
Sterility Test of Ciprofloxacin Suspension (2 messages)
Sterility testing of ciprofloxacin solution for inf usion (1 message)
Sterility testing of ciprofloxacin solution for infusion (2 messages)
Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben. (5 messages)
Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate (8 messages)
surface cleaning procedure (1 message)
TOC (1 message)
TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards (6 messages)
USP<61> limits (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PMFLIST Home

PMFLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<62>

<62>

ADRIAN AMODIA ALMEIDA <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:01:55 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:20:26 +0200

133 lines

<No subject>

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:43:01 -0400

207 lines

<No subject>

EHOU (Ellen Brunbech) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:45:01 +0200

195 lines

New Thread

Acidified Bleach

Acidified Bleach

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:46:33 -0400

54 lines

Re: Acidified Bleach

Shawn Steeves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 05:25:19 -0700

80 lines

Re: Acidified Bleach

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:56:47 -0400

111 lines

Acidified Bleach

Polarine, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:29:41 -0500

170 lines

New Thread

Alternative for fumigation

Re: Alternative for fumigation

ramesh kannan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:51:24 -0700

55 lines

Re: Alternative for fumigation

Mark A. Czarneski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:16:24 -0400

169 lines

Re: Alternative for fumigation

ali raza <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:26:57 -0700

75 lines

Re: Alternative for fumigation

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:36:53 -0600

115 lines

New Thread

Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Megan Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:11:56 -0400

58 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:25:06 -0400

146 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:34:59 -0400

110 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:26:09 -0400

171 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:42:54 -0400

237 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

ADRIAN AMODIA ALMEIDA <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:18:50 -0700

89 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Megan Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:28:52 -0400

57 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:45:32 -0400

238 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Megan Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:41:29 -0400

56 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:08:23 -0400

187 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Dale Kelley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:12:02 -0700

127 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Megan Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:10:13 -0400

81 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Cindy Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:42:41 -0700

114 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:33:23 -0400

187 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:23:10 +0100

238 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:16:26 -0400

326 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Megan Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:15:19 -0400

51 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

ADRIAN AMODIA ALMEIDA <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:51:16 -0700

124 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Greek, Catherine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:06:17 +0200

328 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

sankar naryanan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:05:29 +0530

244 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:07:59 -0700

164 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:14:20 -0700

401 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:07:36 -0700

167 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:59:05 -0400

456 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

David Myatt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:19:50 +1000

135 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:35:50 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Antimicrobial effectiveness testing - testing at 0 h

Antimicrobial effectiveness testing - testing at 0 h

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:38:51 -0700

75 lines

Re: Antimicrobial effectiveness testing - testing at 0 h

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:46:36 +0100

128 lines

Re: Antimicrobial effectiveness testing - testing at 0 h

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:49:35 -0400

222 lines

Re: Antimicrobial effectiveness testing - testing at 0 h

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:53:08 -0700

204 lines

New Thread

Antimicrobial effectiveness testing.

Antimicrobial effectiveness testing.

Micro Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:27:06 +0530

58 lines

Re: Antimicrobial effectiveness testing.

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:46:13 +0100

116 lines

Re: Antimicrobial effectiveness testing.

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:59:19 -0400

146 lines

New Thread

Aspergillus spore suspension

Re: Aspergillus spore suspension

Carolyn Lim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 15:27:35 +0800

296 lines

New Thread

AW: [PMFLIST] AW: [PMFLIST] Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

AW: [PMFLIST] AW: [PMFLIST] Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Axel Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:22:57 +0200

159 lines

New Thread

AW: [PMFLIST] Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Re: AW: [PMFLIST] Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Carole Genovesi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 11:14:06 -0700

96 lines

New Thread

AW: [PMFLIST] Sterile dress used in classified areas - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

AW: [PMFLIST] Sterile dress used in classified areas - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Axel Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:22:11 +0200

116 lines

New Thread

Bacteria D and Z values

Bacteria D and Z values

Erika Rene Blickem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:48:37 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

chemical compatibility

chemical compatibility

joseph GUEDEGBE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:45:59 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

Chlorine dose in water system

Re: Chlorine dose in water system

avadhesh patidar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:40:04 -0700

90 lines

Re: Chlorine dose in water system

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:29:01 -0400

302 lines

Re: Chlorine dose in water system

Rick Jakober <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:37:44 -0400

365 lines

Re: Chlorine dose in water system

Jerry R. Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:29:33 +0000

414 lines

Re: Chlorine dose in water system

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:31:55 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Baruch Pinnick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:18:36 +0300

61 lines

Re: Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Micro Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:16:53 +0200

64 lines

Re: Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:38:41 -0600

133 lines

Re: Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Kamran Asim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:13:10 +0300

129 lines

Re: Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Gurjeet Singh Bedi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:22:20 +0530

130 lines

Re: Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:28:35 -0400

126 lines

Re: Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Baruch Pinnick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:24:50 +0300

56 lines

New Thread

clean steam samplers

clean steam samplers

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:00:00 -0400

73 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Carole Genovesi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:31:38 -0700

128 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Teri C Soli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:24:04 -0400

232 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Carole Genovesi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:15:45 -0700

117 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Luis Raices <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:35:00 -0400

304 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:40:26 +0530

185 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Megan Watts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:11:49 -0400

186 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Shawn Steeves <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:44:55 -0700

229 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:19:01 -0400

289 lines

Re: clean steam samplers

Lutskus Robert - Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:49:29 -0400

262 lines

New Thread

Commercially Purchased Ready-To-Use Media

Re: Commercially Purchased Ready-To-Use Media

Erickson, Marianne C. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:04:26 -0500

116 lines

Re: Commercially Purchased Ready-To-Use Media

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:53:04 +0530

161 lines

Re: Commercially Purchased Ready-To-Use Media

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:41:39 +0200

100 lines

New Thread

Converting I.U. to micrograms for Gentamicin Sulfate

Re: Converting I.U. to micrograms for Gentamicin Sulfate

alessandra garces <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:30:11 -0430

352 lines

Re: Converting I.U. to micrograms for Gentamicin Sulfate

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:56:24 -0700

454 lines

New Thread

Designing a micro lab

Designing a micro lab

Hatziaghelidou Kalli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:04:31 +0300

66 lines

Re: Designing a micro lab

Donna Milazzo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:01:16 +0000

128 lines

Re: Designing a micro lab

kumar anshuman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:46:01 -0000

247 lines

Re: Designing a micro lab

shweta bajoria <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:28:24 +0530

343 lines

Designing a micro lab

Ramchandra Tallu <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:50:57 +0530

376 lines

Re: Designing a micro lab

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:10:03 +0530

135 lines

New Thread

EM mold isolate

EM mold isolate

Chen, Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:22:17 -0400

96 lines

Re: EM mold isolate

Miskowski, Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:46:22 -0400

157 lines

Re: EM mold isolate

shweta bajoria <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:32:34 +0530

148 lines

Re: EM mold isolate

Boominathan, Karuppan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:45:17 -0400

154 lines

New Thread

Enumeration of probiotics

Enumeration of probiotics

V Sankar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:54:30 +0530

91 lines

New Thread

FDA/CBER has a new Sterility Test

FDA/CBER has a new Sterility Test

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:43:50 -0400

93 lines

Re: FDA/CBER has a new Sterility Test

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:16:43 +0100

142 lines

New Thread

FW: FW: [PMFLIST] Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

Re: FW: FW: [PMFLIST] Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:18:22 -0400

212 lines

Re: FW: FW: [PMFLIST] Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

Warwick, Eileen F <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:59:45 -0400

320 lines

New Thread

Fw: ready Culture media

Fw: ready Culture media

saeed hashemi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:22:57 -0700

51 lines

New Thread

FW: [PMFLIST] Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

FW: [PMFLIST] Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Jerry R. Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:18:19 +0000

223 lines

Re: FW: [PMFLIST] Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Devendra Rawal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:54:31 -0700

181 lines

Re: FW: [PMFLIST] Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:57:43 -0800

62 lines

Re: FW: [PMFLIST] Choice of media for autoclave validation runs

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:06:16 -0600

289 lines

New Thread

Gentamicin residue removal

Gentamicin residue removal

Hill, A (Ann) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:11:25 -0400

75 lines

Re: Gentamicin residue removal

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:58:34 -0400

150 lines

New Thread

Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media

Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:10:19 -0800

70 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:22:12 -0400

74 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:48:36 +0100

136 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:52:23 -0600

139 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media

Robert W Pritchett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:47:50 -0400

154 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Test of each batch prepared media

Datar, Dhananjay [JNJINAU] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:17:43 +0530

133 lines

New Thread

How to eliminate the chlorine effect in a microbiol ogical water sample

Re: How to eliminate the chlorine effect in a microbiol ogical water sample

Fuller, Angela <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:23:39 -0400

257 lines

New Thread

How to eliminate the chlorine effect in a microbiological water sample

How to eliminate the chlorine effect in a microbiological water sample

mariam gindia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:29:26 +0000

195 lines

New Thread

Identification of microorganisms

Identification of microorganisms

mariam gindia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:10:44 +0000

58 lines

Re: Identification of microorganisms

Vinod Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:54:37 +0530

126 lines

New Thread

In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

meylina frida <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:32:08 -0700

53 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

Baruch Pinnick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:18:46 +0300

77 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:22:23 -0400

139 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

Villa, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:54:33 -0400

128 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:48:42 +0530

104 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

meylina frida <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 06:55:26 -0700

194 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

ravi kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:07:48 +0530

241 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:01:35 -0400

368 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

Baruch Pinnick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:55:47 +0300

87 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:12:04 -0400

166 lines

Re: In House Preparation Vs Ready To Used Media

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:59:35 +0530

147 lines

New Thread

Incubation Temperature for EM Plate

Incubation Temperature for EM Plate

Jaymit Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:39:51 +0530

92 lines

Re: Incubation Temperature for EM Plate

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:59:13 -0400

198 lines

Re: Incubation Temperature for EM Plate

TANABE Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:46:32 +0200

224 lines

Re: Incubation Temperature for EM Plate

meylina frida <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:47:35 -0700

177 lines

New Thread

Not exactly a microbiology question but...

Not exactly a microbiology question but...

Shawn Steeves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 12:28:05 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

OOS result

OOS result

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:42:08 -0400

63 lines

Re: OOS result

SABA MUSTIKHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:46:37 -0700

126 lines

New Thread

Particle Counters

Particle Counters

Robert Ryan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:11:45 +0000

79 lines

New Thread

PMF list

PMF list

Prado, Antonio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:30:18 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Practical demonstration on sterility test in Isolator

Re: Practical demonstration on sterility test in Isolator

meylina frida <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 04:35:24 -0700

287 lines

Re: Practical demonstration on sterility test in Isolator

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:17:10 -0400

366 lines

Re: Practical demonstration on sterility test in Isolator

meylina frida <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:53:35 -0700

449 lines

Re: Practical demonstration on sterility test in Isolator

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:15:17 +0700

471 lines

New Thread

Pre-incubation EM Media

Re: Pre-incubation EM Media

VAIBHAV SABLE <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 May 2011 08:21:31 +0530

339 lines

Re: Pre-incubation EM Media

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:54:26 +0700

424 lines

Re: Pre-incubation EM Media

Gurjeet Singh Bedi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:59:54 +0530

265 lines

Re: Pre-incubation EM Media

satish bansode <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:45:26 -0700

133 lines

New Thread

Preparatory testing of same raw material with different suppliers

Preparatory testing of same raw material with different suppliers

Cherri Presley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:09:02 -0500

56 lines

Re: Preparatory testing of same raw material with different suppliers

Villa, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:10:41 -0400

120 lines

Re: Preparatory testing of same raw material with different suppliers

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:22:12 -0500

188 lines

Re: Preparatory testing of same raw material with different suppliers

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:37:04 -0400

272 lines

Re: Preparatory testing of same raw material with different suppliers

Dawn McIver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:27:29 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

Pseudomanas spp or Pseudomonas aeruginosa only?

Pseudomanas spp or Pseudomonas aeruginosa only?

shougata bose <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:48:55 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Question

Re: Question

Vinodaran <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:16:22 +0530

179 lines

New Thread

Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Re: Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 14:44:49 -0400

86 lines

Re: Question - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 15:25:49 -0400

414 lines

New Thread

Question regarding aseptic transfer of materials

Re: Question regarding aseptic transfer of materials

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 May 2011 19:07:42 +0530

128 lines

Re: Question regarding aseptic transfer of materials

meylina frida <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:41:38 -0700

193 lines

Re: Question regarding aseptic transfer of materials

ravikanth gandla <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:35:10 +0530

188 lines

Re: Question regarding aseptic transfer of materials

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:32:01 +0530

241 lines

New Thread

Reg.Clostridium sporogenes analysis

Reg.Clostridium sporogenes analysis

chelvaa kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:58:54 -0000

56 lines

New Thread

Reg.Env.monitoring

Reg.Env.monitoring

chelvaa kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:09:15 -0000

55 lines

New Thread

REQUEST: Test Diluent System Emulsifier Comparison

REQUEST: Test Diluent System Emulsifier Comparison

Coyle, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:09:09 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

Responsible to initiate protocol

Responsible to initiate protocol

shougata bose <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:41:10 -0700

52 lines

Re: Responsible to initiate protocol

vivek nayak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:13:37 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

Seed Lot Technique and Five Passages for EM Isolates

Seed Lot Technique and Five Passages for EM Isolates

Luis Raices <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:37:16 -0400

72 lines

Re: Seed Lot Technique and Five Passages for EM Isolates

Dawn McIver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:19:58 -0500

132 lines

Re: Seed Lot Technique and Five Passages for EM Isolates

Bob Westney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:52:22 -0400

136 lines

New Thread

Some micro queries.

Some micro queries.

natarajan prabu <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:32:22 +0530

58 lines

Re: Some micro queries.

srihari srihari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:31:52 -0700

158 lines

Re: Some micro queries.

Rob Nixon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:55:12 +0100

171 lines

Re: Some micro queries.

Gangesh.chennupalli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:14:10 -0400

135 lines

New Thread

Source of commerical isolates

Source of commerical isolates

Geis, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 15:25:20 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:50:59 -0700

68 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

ali raza <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 06:21:54 -0700

85 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Carolyn Lim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:26:54 +0800

183 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Gurjeet Singh Bedi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:03:48 +0530

103 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:25:43 -0400

263 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:47:34 +0700

145 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Fuller, Angela <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:03:01 -0400

215 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:56:24 -0700

262 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:48:05 -0700

328 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:05:33 -0400

325 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Entrup, Mark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:16:11 -0400

339 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:59:33 -0700

383 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:08:38 +0200

461 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:41:08 -0400

440 lines

Re: Spread-plate, max. volume of inoculum

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:20:17 -0800

67 lines

New Thread

Sterile dress used in classified areas

Sterile dress used in classified areas

Rock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:35:47 -0000

49 lines

Re: Sterile dress used in classified areas

meylina frida <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 06:13:17 -0700

111 lines

New Thread

Sterility Test of Ciprofloxacin Suspension

Sterility Test of Ciprofloxacin Suspension

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:27:39 -0400

64 lines

Re: Sterility Test of Ciprofloxacin Suspension

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:26:17 +0530

117 lines

New Thread

Sterility testing of ciprofloxacin solution for inf usion

Re: Sterility testing of ciprofloxacin solution for inf usion

Fuller, Angela <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:36:19 -0400

237 lines

New Thread

Sterility testing of ciprofloxacin solution for infusion

Sterility testing of ciprofloxacin solution for infusion

Defterigou Olga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:02:03 +0300

101 lines

Re: Sterility testing of ciprofloxacin solution for infusion

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:18:16 -0700

170 lines

New Thread

Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

Re: Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 May 2011 22:03:11 -0400

113 lines

Re: Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 30 May 2011 09:34:08 +0200

64 lines

Re: Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

Agnieszka McAndrew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 May 2011 23:35:35 +0000

125 lines

Re: Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 31 May 2011 08:49:45 -0400

143 lines

Re: Sterility testing of methyl and propyl paraben.

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 31 May 2011 12:14:44 -0400

147 lines

New Thread

Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Doug Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:45:04 -0400

71 lines

Re: Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Dr Tony Breeze <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:57:12 +0100

96 lines

Re: Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Vishwas Kelkar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:58:00 +0000

129 lines

Re: Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

ali raza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:08:34 -0700

84 lines

Re: Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Brinkman, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:18:57 -0700

78 lines

Re: Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Brinkman, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:21:38 -0700

127 lines

Re: Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Doug Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:57:12 -0400

178 lines

Re: Sterility Testing of Streptomycin Sulfate

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:33 -0400

182 lines

New Thread

surface cleaning procedure

surface cleaning procedure

Sara Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:35:36 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

TOC

TOC

sankaram p <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Jun 2011 07:39:54 +0530

58 lines

New Thread

TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards

TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards

Donna Milazzo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 May 2011 22:12:08 +0000

71 lines

Re: TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards

Rick Jakober <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:21:21 -0400

135 lines

Re: TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards

ashok udigiri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:52:42 -0700

53 lines

Re: TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards

Charles Harter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:02:45 -0500

136 lines

Re: TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:44:48 -0500

189 lines

Re: TOC-Acceptance Criteria for Daily Standards

Vinod Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Jun 2011 04:03:15 +0530

196 lines

New Thread

USP<61> limits

Re: USP<61> limits

alessandra garces <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:37:18 -0430

120 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.MICROBIOLOGYNETWORK.COM

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager