LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PMFLIST Archives


PMFLIST Archives

PMFLIST Archives


February 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<No subject> (1 message)
Acceptal limit of powder container (1 message)
air control (8 messages)
Air monitoring (2 messages)
ANOVA on time-kill results (2 messages)
Aseptic gowning: Surgical Mask UNDER Hood? (1 message)
AW: [PMFLIST] Bioburden of Desinfectants - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt. (1 message)
BET method validation (1 message)
beta lactamase (2 messages)
Bile Tolerant gram Negatives (2 messages)
Bioburden of Desinfectants (7 messages)
Bioburden of Disinfectants (1 message)
Biological Indicator (1 message)
cell counts (4 messages)
cell density measuring protocol (4 messages)
Class A limit is average value (1 message)
Colony Counter! (1 message)
CR validation duration (1 message)
Definition of annual, quarterly, monthly, weekly (2 messages)
Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory (10 messages)
Enrofloxacin Tablets Microbial Enumeration <61>, <62>, <1111> and <1227> Validation (4 messages)
Environmental Action level follow-up (5 messages)
Equipment for Particle Count Test (3 messages)
Expiration Date of Media (11 messages)
exposure time of one settle plate (6 messages)
FW: Acceptable limit of powder container in sterile filling area (1 message)
Fw: [PMFLIST] U.V efficacy test (1 message)
FW: [PMFLIST] USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter? (1 message)
Gamma irradiation services (5 messages)
Grade C nonviable monitoring (1 message)
Growth Promotion of the Media (13 messages)
Growth promotion organisms (1 message)
Heamolysis on BGA of pertusis 509 strain (2 messages)
inactivation of aminoglycoside antibiotics (5 messages)
Incubation period for MLT (1 message)
Innoculum standardization (2 messages)
interlocking doors leading to Class 8 room (5 messages)
Lab Decontamination Assessment (5 messages)
Lessons from FDA Recalls (2 messages)
Looking for other R&D Microbiologist (1 message)
Media Hold study (4 messages)
Microbiology QC system (1 message)
Microbiology workshop (1 message)
Overkill Approch (1 message)
Penicillin Bioassay Lab in India (4 messages)
Perfect Air Sampler for Non-Sterile Area :MAS 100 NT, Buck Bio Culture OR MTech V100 (1 message)
Possibilities for identifying specified org. (3 messages)
PQ of incubators (1 message)
Probiotics Methods (7 messages)
Question on suitable method for testing of Cell Culture samples (mammalian cells) for In-Process bioburden verification (1 message)
RCS vs. MAS-100NT (9 messages)
reg. GPT (5 messages)
Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria (3 messages)
Routine nonviable sampling in classified areas (5 messages)
Sterility test (1 message)
stock cultures (4 messages)
TDS (2 messages)
Testing of white petrolatum (1 message)
Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products (7 messages)
TOC/conductivity off-line to on-line testing of PW (3 messages)
U.V efficacy test (5 messages)
U.V light in pass box (1 message)
Using of Micro.Bio2 instead of settle plates (2 messages)
USP <62> Test for inhibitory properties (4 messages)
USP growth promotion - selective media (9 messages)
USP pre-treatment ports bioburden (3 messages)
USP Purified Water System - .22 micro filter? (2 messages)
USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter? (5 messages)
Uv validation (1 message)
want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP (8 messages)
Water sample port placement - hardpiped delivery (1 message)
which one is better Incubator: Iso Temp Forced Air or Mechanical Convection Incubator (2 messages)
] Standardizing Cultures (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PMFLIST Home

PMFLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

pree vuppala <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:28:57 +0530

54 lines

New Thread

Acceptal limit of powder container

Acceptal limit of powder container

Samir Aly. Mohamed <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:06:54 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

air control

air control

Olja Knezevic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:18:50 +0100

60 lines

Re: air control

Tirado, Wil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:40:24 -0500

139 lines

Re: air control

Anne Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:30:00 -0500

122 lines

Re: air control

Robert Ryan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:52:36 +0000

186 lines

Re: air control

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:39:08 -0800

133 lines

Re: air control

ali raza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:11:05 -0800

92 lines

Re: air control

Lim, Chin Chuan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:20:10 +0000

136 lines

Re: air control

Olja Knezevic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:13:08 +0100

191 lines

New Thread

Air monitoring

Air monitoring

Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:10:26 +0800

152 lines

Re: Air monitoring

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:53:30 -0500

203 lines

New Thread

ANOVA on time-kill results

ANOVA on time-kill results

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:21:10 -0800

58 lines

Re: ANOVA on time-kill results

Néstor Oscar Aversa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:48:34 -0300

123 lines

New Thread

Aseptic gowning: Surgical Mask UNDER Hood?

Re: Aseptic gowning: Surgical Mask UNDER Hood?

Michael Carroll <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:45:17 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

AW: [PMFLIST] Bioburden of Desinfectants - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

AW: [PMFLIST] Bioburden of Desinfectants - Der Bayes'sche Filter hat Spam erkannt.

Axel Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:07:27 +0100

289 lines

New Thread

BET method validation

Re: BET method validation

sureshbabu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:13:07 -0000

322 lines

New Thread

beta lactamase

beta lactamase

Priyanka Panchal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:56:59 +0800

53 lines

Re: beta lactamase

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:15:43 -0800

138 lines

New Thread

Bile Tolerant gram Negatives

Bile Tolerant gram Negatives

Robert Ryan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:43:00 +0000

87 lines

Re: Bile Tolerant gram Negatives

Micro Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:41 +0200

61 lines

New Thread

Bioburden of Desinfectants

Re: Bioburden of Desinfectants

David Carlberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:40:40 -0800

173 lines

Re: Bioburden of Desinfectants

Aswath Rama Reddy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:43:05 +0530

120 lines

Re: Bioburden of Desinfectants

Micro Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:08:44 +0200

60 lines

Re: Bioburden of Desinfectants

srikanth reddy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:46:11 +0530

116 lines

Re: Bioburden of Desinfectants

Noushin Pourghobadi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:06:55 -0800

115 lines

Re: Bioburden of Desinfectants

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:03:36 -0500

253 lines

Re: Bioburden of Desinfectants

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:49:01 -0500

122 lines

New Thread

Bioburden of Disinfectants

Re: Bioburden of Disinfectants

Tahir Rasool <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:53:26 +0000

236 lines

New Thread

Biological Indicator

Biological Indicator

Jaymit Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:17:23 +0000

80 lines

New Thread

cell counts

Re: cell counts

Cindy Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:03:34 -0800

174 lines

Re: cell counts

Adnan Zahid (Assistant Manager Quality Control) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:49:42 +0000

381 lines

Re: cell counts

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:30:09 -0800

370 lines

Re: cell counts

Syed Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:11:05 -0500

480 lines

New Thread

cell density measuring protocol

cell density measuring protocol

Ed. Kim. Pak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:49:59 -0800

59 lines

Re: cell density measuring protocol

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:47:16 -0500

142 lines

Re: cell density measuring protocol

David Carlberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:29:07 -0800

124 lines

Re: cell density measuring protocol

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:58:37 -0800

119 lines

New Thread

Class A limit is average value

Class A limit is average value

Samir Aly. Mohamed <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:51:05 +0200

56 lines

New Thread

Colony Counter!

Re: Colony Counter!

Sanjay Sanghvi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:53:30 +0530

285 lines

New Thread

CR validation duration

CR validation duration

Lukasz M. Geraga, Grizzly Medical, PL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:59:37 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Definition of annual, quarterly, monthly, weekly

Definition of annual, quarterly, monthly, weekly

Prasad, Aditya <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:46:09 +0000

65 lines

Re: Definition of annual, quarterly, monthly, weekly

Prasad, Aditya <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:32:18 +0000

129 lines

New Thread

Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Syed Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:03:03 -0500

244 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:35:55 -0800

281 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:39:27 -0800

298 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Lim, Chin Chuan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 04:47:36 +0000

200 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Lim, Chin Chuan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 04:49:10 +0000

230 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Lim, Chin Chuan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 04:57:11 +0000

231 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:40:17 +0000

289 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:08:56 -0800

300 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:44:18 -0800

317 lines

Re: Different Bacteria Count between In-house Lab and External Laboratory

Balkovic, Ed GZ/US <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:15:05 -0500

276 lines

New Thread

Enrofloxacin Tablets Microbial Enumeration <61>, <62>, <1111> and <1227> Validation

Enrofloxacin Tablets Microbial Enumeration <61>, <62>, <1111> and <1227> Validation

Lokesh Kumar Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 19:20:34 +0530

62 lines

Re: Enrofloxacin Tablets Microbial Enumeration <61>, <62>, <1111> and <1227> Validation

narendra <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:30:46 +0530

121 lines

Re: Enrofloxacin Tablets Microbial Enumeration <61>, <62>, <1111> and <1227> Validation

Jyoti Keswani <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:39:01 -0500

189 lines

Re: Enrofloxacin Tablets Microbial Enumeration <61>, <62>, <1111> and <1227> Validation

SHADY ABD EL-RAOUF <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:13:45 +0000

130 lines

New Thread

Environmental Action level follow-up

Environmental Action level follow-up

Scott Rollins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:17:25 -0500

67 lines

Re: Environmental Action level follow-up

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:22:27 +0000

142 lines

Re: Environmental Action level follow-up

Scott Rollins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:11:55 -0500

198 lines

Re: Environmental Action level follow-up

Noushin Pourghobadi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:46:59 -0800

94 lines

Re: Environmental Action level follow-up

Eoin Duff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:41:17 +0000

258 lines

New Thread

Equipment for Particle Count Test

Equipment for Particle Count Test

Megan Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:37:57 -0500

68 lines

Re: Equipment for Particle Count Test

microbes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:37:42 -0500

140 lines

Re: Equipment for Particle Count Test

Megan Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:57:01 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Expiration Date of Media

Expiration Date of Media

Lizmarie Manzano <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:50:21 -0500

69 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Ruether, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:50:00 -0600

149 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:18:54 +0000

148 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:31:18 -0500

148 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:57:08 -0800

148 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:54:34 -0800

139 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:00:26 +0530

119 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Diego Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:50:36 -0300

126 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Jyoti Keswani <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:25:26 -0500

135 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Lizmarie Manzano <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:21:42 -0500

202 lines

Re: Expiration Date of Media

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:03:17 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

exposure time of one settle plate

exposure time of one settle plate

Mesic, Sasa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:18:12 +0000

75 lines

Re: exposure time of one settle plate

Sandra Palacios <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:56:45 +0000

164 lines

Re: exposure time of one settle plate

Carlson Patterson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:11:07 -0800

109 lines

Re: exposure time of one settle plate

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:11:47 -0800

143 lines

Re: exposure time of one settle plate

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:23:07 -0800

142 lines

Re: exposure time of one settle plate

guna seela <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:24:54 +0800

132 lines

New Thread

FW: Acceptable limit of powder container in sterile filling area

FW: Acceptable limit of powder container in sterile filling area

Samir Aly. Mohamed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:01:14 +0200

114 lines

New Thread

Fw: [PMFLIST] U.V efficacy test

Fw: [PMFLIST] U.V efficacy test

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:40 +0530

168 lines

New Thread

FW: [PMFLIST] USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

FW: [PMFLIST] USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

Clint Christensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:15:56 +0000

233 lines

New Thread

Gamma irradiation services

Re: Gamma irradiation services

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:01:49 +0530

83 lines

Re: Gamma irradiation services

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:06:16 -0600

132 lines

Re: Gamma irradiation services

Art Vellutato, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:40:45 -0500

129 lines

Re: Gamma irradiation services

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:35:44 +0000

108 lines

Re: Gamma irradiation services

Luebke, Michelle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:05:10 +0000

219 lines

New Thread

Grade C nonviable monitoring

Grade C nonviable monitoring

Craig LaBarre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:57:55 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Growth Promotion of the Media

Growth Promotion of the Media

Prasad, Aditya <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:39:28 +0000

67 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:50:45 -0800

139 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:01:08 +0530

113 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

chelvaa kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:48:07 -0000

149 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:05:31 -0500

123 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:44:41 +0530

195 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Erickson, Marianne C. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:22:51 +0000

283 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:49:13 -0800

298 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Prasad, Aditya <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:32:38 +0000

281 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

vivek nayak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:08:14 -0800

185 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Lopez, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:01:26 +0000

351 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:43:12 +0530

359 lines

Re: Growth Promotion of the Media

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:15:24 -0800

442 lines

New Thread

Growth promotion organisms

Growth promotion organisms

Brianne Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:55:06 +0000

66 lines

New Thread

Heamolysis on BGA of pertusis 509 strain

Heamolysis on BGA of pertusis 509 strain

ashok udigiri <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:59:36 +0530

62 lines

Re: Heamolysis on BGA of pertusis 509 strain

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:11:31 -0800

123 lines

New Thread

inactivation of aminoglycoside antibiotics

inactivation of aminoglycoside antibiotics

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:40:22 +0100

66 lines

Re: inactivation of aminoglycoside antibiotics

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:03:53 -0800

132 lines

Re: inactivation of aminoglycoside antibiotics

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:07:49 +0530

115 lines

Re: inactivation of aminoglycoside antibiotics

Dr Tony Breeze <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:28:03 -0000

110 lines

Re: inactivation of aminoglycoside antibiotics

Dr Tony Breeze <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:55:57 -0000

90 lines

New Thread

Incubation period for MLT

Incubation period for MLT

chandrakant mahakal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:01:25 +0530

63 lines

New Thread

Innoculum standardization

Innoculum standardization

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:40:19 +0000

53 lines

Re: Innoculum standardization

Bob Westney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:02:04 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

interlocking doors leading to Class 8 room

interlocking doors leading to Class 8 room

Peter Lisecki <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:19:12 -0500

56 lines

Re: interlocking doors leading to Class 8 room

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:57:01 +0000

130 lines

Re: interlocking doors leading to Class 8 room

Peter Lisecki <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:55:57 -0500

192 lines

Re: interlocking doors leading to Class 8 room

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:04:08 +0530

104 lines

Re: interlocking doors leading to Class 8 room

Lagomarsino Mónica <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:01:18 +0000

259 lines

New Thread

Lab Decontamination Assessment

Lab Decontamination Assessment

Ruether, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:27:25 -0600

87 lines

Re: Lab Decontamination Assessment

Néstor Oscar Aversa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:10:07 -0300

148 lines

Re: Lab Decontamination Assessment

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:42:01 -0600

167 lines

Re: Lab Decontamination Assessment

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:36:37 +0000

150 lines

Re: Lab Decontamination Assessment

Stack, Kathy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:48:46 +0000

203 lines

New Thread

Lessons from FDA Recalls

Lessons from FDA Recalls

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 07:19:08 -0500

110 lines

Re: Lessons from FDA Recalls

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:54:42 -0500

171 lines

New Thread

Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

Paul Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:50:36 -0600

61 lines

New Thread

Media Hold study

Media Hold study

Freeman, Freda (NIH/VRC) [C] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:07:18 -0500

58 lines

Re: Media Hold study

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:37:35 +0100

139 lines

Re: Media Hold study

SABA MUSTIKHAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:32:34 -0800

114 lines

Re: Media Hold study

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:03:28 -0500

113 lines

New Thread

Microbiology QC system

Re: Microbiology QC system

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:13:25 -0500

206 lines

New Thread

Microbiology workshop

Microbiology workshop

Jermyn, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:48:47 +0000

65 lines

New Thread

Overkill Approch

Overkill Approch

Jaymit Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:20:32 +0000

63 lines

New Thread

Penicillin Bioassay Lab in India

Penicillin Bioassay Lab in India

debjit_mukherjee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:30:11 +0530

64 lines

Re: Penicillin Bioassay Lab in India

Gottumukkala V. Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:00:29 +0200

129 lines

Re: Penicillin Bioassay Lab in India

microbio laboratory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:37:01 +0530

86 lines

Re: Penicillin Bioassay Lab in India

surrjit Kaur <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:41:52 +0530

142 lines

New Thread

Perfect Air Sampler for Non-Sterile Area :MAS 100 NT, Buck Bio Culture OR MTech V100

Perfect Air Sampler for Non-Sterile Area :MAS 100 NT, Buck Bio Culture OR MTech V100

Jayshree Mishra <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 07:50:22 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Possibilities for identifying specified org.

Possibilities for identifying specified org.

chandrakant mahakal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:43:32 +0800

63 lines

Re: Possibilities for identifying specified org.

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 26 Feb 2012 03:19:04 +0000

93 lines

Re: Possibilities for identifying specified org.

sankaram p <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:52 +0530

131 lines

New Thread

PQ of incubators

PQ of incubators

Peter Lisecki <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:48:06 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Probiotics Methods

Probiotics Methods

Argentina Guerrero <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:35:19 -0800

58 lines

Re: Probiotics Methods

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:47:59 -0500

147 lines

Re: Probiotics Methods

N.R.Deshpande. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:54:58 +0530

113 lines

Re: Probiotics Methods

Argentina Guerrero <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:45:51 -0800

194 lines

Re: Probiotics Methods

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:08:13 -0600

111 lines

Re: Probiotics Methods

Zankhana Bhatt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:30:44 -0800

242 lines

Re: Probiotics Methods

walter mazzini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:22:35 -0800

116 lines

New Thread

Question on suitable method for testing of Cell Culture samples (mammalian cells) for In-Process bioburden verification

Re: Question on suitable method for testing of Cell Culture samples (mammalian cells) for In-Process bioburden verification

SHADY ABD EL-RAOUF <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:46:02 +0000

138 lines

New Thread

RCS vs. MAS-100NT

RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Paciulan, Brian V <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:38:10 -0500

74 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:29:14 -0600

149 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:16:22 -0500

154 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:43:42 -0800

154 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:32:07 +0000

85 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Nicoline Bæk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:13:34 +0100

138 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Nicoline Bæk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:50:15 +0100

139 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:11:54 -0500

223 lines

Re: RCS vs. MAS-100NT

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:24:09 +0000

213 lines

New Thread

reg. GPT

reg. GPT

sanjay sangram mande <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:24:20 -0000

55 lines

Re: reg. GPT

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:46:33 -0500

125 lines

Re: reg. GPT

rajesheranna kamlapur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:19:37 +0530

113 lines

Re: reg. GPT

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:23:28 +0530

103 lines

Re: reg. GPT

anil patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:31:13 +0530

101 lines

New Thread

Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

SHADY ABD EL-RAOUF <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:11:30 +0000

138 lines

Re: Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

Wong, Gilman (Hong Kong) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:24:06 -0500

231 lines

Re: Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

chandrakant mahakal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:09:11 +0800

124 lines

New Thread

Routine nonviable sampling in classified areas

Routine nonviable sampling in classified areas

Craig LaBarre <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:27:36 -0500

65 lines

Re: Routine nonviable sampling in classified areas

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:47:30 -0500

117 lines

Re: Routine nonviable sampling in classified areas

Craig LaBarre <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:24:48 -0500

177 lines

Re: Routine nonviable sampling in classified areas

Tahir Rasool <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:48:27 +0000

255 lines

Re: Routine nonviable sampling in classified areas

rajesheranna kamlapur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:10:50 +0530

121 lines

New Thread

Sterility test

Sterility test

QFB. Gabriela González Zañudo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:22:43 -0600

59 lines

New Thread

stock cultures

stock cultures

Cindy Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:49:53 -0800

52 lines

Re: stock cultures

Russ Nyberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:51:57 +0000

125 lines

Re: stock cultures

KarlB <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:56:36 -0000

158 lines

Re: stock cultures

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:37:33 -0500

114 lines

New Thread

TDS

TDS

Sue Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:32:04 +0000

76 lines

Re: TDS

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:25:06 +0000

146 lines

New Thread

Testing of white petrolatum

Testing of white petrolatum

JW <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:50:51 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

Jayshree Mishra <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:38:09 -0500

78 lines

Re: Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:21:16 +0000

132 lines

Re: Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:48:02 -0500

152 lines

Re: Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

Cindy Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:10:14 -0800

118 lines

Re: Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:52:18 -0500

280 lines

Re: Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

Cindy Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:03:12 -0800

170 lines

Re: Thoughts on Preservatives for Cosmetic Products

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:28:22 -0500

406 lines

New Thread

TOC/conductivity off-line to on-line testing of PW

TOC/conductivity off-line to on-line testing of PW

Dolan, Anne-Marie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:08:15 +0000

75 lines

Re: TOC/conductivity off-line to on-line testing of PW

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:56:45 -0700

156 lines

Re: TOC/conductivity off-line to on-line testing of PW

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:43:25 +0530

138 lines

New Thread

U.V efficacy test

U.V efficacy test

anjireddy reddy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:18:53 +0530

58 lines

Re: U.V efficacy test

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:45:23 +0000

110 lines

Re: U.V efficacy test

nishtha <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:51:27 +0530

107 lines

Re: U.V efficacy test

Mohd Abutaqieh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:27:08 +0400

103 lines

Re: U.V efficacy test

Tim Sandle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:53:26 +0000

199 lines

New Thread

U.V light in pass box

U.V light in pass box

Samir Aly. Mohamed <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:16:37 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

Using of Micro.Bio2 instead of settle plates

Using of Micro.Bio2 instead of settle plates

Samir Aly. Mohamed <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:18:13 +0200

57 lines

Re: Using of Micro.Bio2 instead of settle plates

ali raza <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:14:19 -0800

102 lines

New Thread

USP <62> Test for inhibitory properties

USP <62> Test for inhibitory properties

Charles Harter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:16:14 -0600

63 lines

Re: USP <62> Test for inhibitory properties

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:08:38 -0500

123 lines

Re: USP <62> Test for inhibitory properties

Charles Harter <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:26:14 -0600

115 lines

Re: USP <62> Test for inhibitory properties

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:51:32 -0800

138 lines

New Thread

USP growth promotion - selective media

USP growth promotion - selective media

Brianne Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:33:28 +0000

70 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

Baruch Pinnick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:27:22 +0200

94 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

LOKI <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:29:44 +0530

121 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

LOKI <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:35:33 +0530

121 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:13:22 -0800

143 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

Micro Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:16:40 +0200

57 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:13:30 -0800

191 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

Brianne Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:47:21 +0000

266 lines

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:41:22 -0800

325 lines

New Thread

USP pre-treatment ports bioburden

USP pre-treatment ports bioburden

Tammy Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:00:19 -0500

64 lines

Re: USP pre-treatment ports bioburden

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:47:05 -0500

139 lines

Re: USP pre-treatment ports bioburden

Tammy Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:44:40 -0500

184 lines

New Thread

USP Purified Water System - .22 micro filter?

USP Purified Water System - .22 micro filter?

Clint Christensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:02:41 +0000

72 lines

Re: USP Purified Water System - .22 micro filter?

Néstor Oscar Aversa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:44:10 -0300

138 lines

New Thread

USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

Re: USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

Clint Christensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:26:37 +0000

216 lines

Re: USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

Néstor Oscar Aversa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:55:04 -0300

286 lines

Re: USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

TeriC Soli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:55:01 -0500

408 lines

Re: USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

Albert, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:23:57 +0000

289 lines

Re: USP Purified Water System - .22/.45 micron filter?

TeriC Soli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:00:27 -0500

442 lines

New Thread

Uv validation

Uv validation

nishtha <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2012 23:19:29 +0530

55 lines

New Thread

want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Shweta Bajoria <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:10:36 +0530

65 lines

Re: want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:57:03 +0000

118 lines

Re: want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 21:22:45 -0500

141 lines

Re: want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:56:20 -0500

197 lines

Re: want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:19:05 +0000

269 lines

Re: want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:44:03 -0500

334 lines

Re: want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:58:14 +0000

408 lines

Re: want to get rid of 14 days for sterlity assaurance of LVP and SVP

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:30:06 -0500

456 lines

New Thread

Water sample port placement - hardpiped delivery

Re: Water sample port placement - hardpiped delivery

Scott Rollins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:29:40 -0500

219 lines

New Thread

which one is better Incubator: Iso Temp Forced Air or Mechanical Convection Incubator

Re: which one is better Incubator: Iso Temp Forced Air or Mechanical Convection Incubator

Gottumukkala V. Raju <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:56:36 +0200

132 lines

Re: which one is better Incubator: Iso Temp Forced Air or Mechanical Convection Incubator

Néstor Oscar Aversa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:57:32 -0300

185 lines

New Thread

] Standardizing Cultures

] Standardizing Cultures

Blewitt, John [CONZA] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:07:07 +0100

179 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.MICROBIOLOGYNETWORK.COM

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager