LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PMFLIST Archives


PMFLIST Archives

PMFLIST Archives


March 2012


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<No subject> (2 messages)
Anaerobic tablet (5 messages)
Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing (2 messages)
Antimicrobial efficacy (14 messages)
Autoclave Load Patterns (3 messages)
Autoclave Validation (Penetration Study) (1 message)
Automated micro analysis (2 messages)
Bacitracin Zinc standard (2 messages)
Bacterial Endotoxins test at end of shelf-life - parenteral drugs (1 message)
Ball valves in water system that remain open (1 message)
beta lactamase (2 messages)
Biological challenge test for continuous bio kill system (2 messages)
Biological Indicators in routine (9 messages)
Consumer Care R&D Microbiologists? (1 message)
container closure integrity (1 message)
Definition of Objectionable Microorganisms (4 messages)
Dry surface prior to application of disinfectant? (1 message)
Electronic LIMS (3 messages)
Evaluation of operater garment bioburden (1 message)
FDA "Loses" Case on Control of Antibiotics in Livestock Feed (1 message)
Growth Promotion Requirements (11 messages)
Hi all (7 messages)
Hold Times for Bioburden samples (7 messages)
Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated? (7 messages)
ISO-8573 (2 messages)
Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet (10 messages)
Looking for other R&D Microbiologist (5 messages)
MB cytostatic (1 message)
Media Hold study (1 message)
microbial testing of paper & soap (5 messages)
microbiological examination of non-sterile products, BP appendix XVI B (2 messages)
Modified Media Fill? (2 messages)
non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane (6 messages)
Organism resuscitation (1 message)
PQ for Liquid Particle Counter (3 messages)
Question: Microbial Product Design Considerations for Non-sterile Products Used by Immuno-compromised Individuals (1 message)
Reference for having to Test Bioburden Samples within 24 hours of sample receipt (3 messages)
Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria (4 messages)
RV: Microbial testing of containers (1 message)
Salmonella testing (2 messages)
Something for the weekend (1 message)
Sterile glove lot/inventory control (1 message)
Sterile Wet Swab For environmental monitoring (3 messages)
Sterility check of media (1 message)
sterility test method validation (2 messages)
Sterilization Validation Aproach (3 messages)
Storage practice for Tri-clamp and Gaskets (2 messages)
TAMC (2 messages)
Typed C.albicans (1 message)
U.V efficacy test (2 messages)
use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA) (9 messages)
Use of Sodium actate in terminal sterilzation (1 message)
USP 61 62 Validation (8 messages)
USP 62 (9 messages)
USP growth promotion - selective media (1 message)
Validation of Air Samplers (2 messages)
What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)? (13 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PMFLIST Home

PMFLIST Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:24:54 +0200

74 lines

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:29:44 +0000

82 lines

New Thread

Anaerobic tablet

Anaerobic tablet

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:01:34 -0400

51 lines

Re: Anaerobic tablet

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:25:07 +0000

61 lines

Re: Anaerobic tablet

Jonathan Swenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:43:20 +0000

122 lines

Re: Anaerobic tablet

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:41:59 -0700

116 lines

Re: Anaerobic tablet

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:25:48 -0400

184 lines

New Thread

Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:11:40 -0400

55 lines

Re: Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:44:55 -0400

108 lines

New Thread

Antimicrobial efficacy

Antimicrobial efficacy

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 02:49:44 -0800

74 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:07:02 +0000

146 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:53:39 +0530

148 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:55:15 -0500

167 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:29:32 -0800

118 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:36:06 -0800

140 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Jelena Peric <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 22:02:37 -0800

129 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 20:39:44 +0000

218 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:07:24 -0800

163 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:42:03 +0530

222 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:38:58 +0000

287 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:06:32 -0700

182 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:30:43 -0800

60 lines

Re: Antimicrobial efficacy

Kate Ambrus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:07:26 -0700

224 lines

New Thread

Autoclave Load Patterns

Autoclave Load Patterns

Heather McCormick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:54:08 -0400

78 lines

Re: Autoclave Load Patterns

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:55:31 -0700

153 lines

Re: Autoclave Load Patterns

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:15:57 -0500

170 lines

New Thread

Autoclave Validation (Penetration Study)

Autoclave Validation (Penetration Study)

ADRIAN AMODIA ALMEIDA <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:53:35 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

Automated micro analysis

Automated micro analysis

David Metzger <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:45:18 -0500

71 lines

Re: Automated micro analysis

Ruth Eden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:14:19 -0400

135 lines

New Thread

Bacitracin Zinc standard

Bacitracin Zinc standard

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:18:53 +0000

92 lines

Re: Bacitracin Zinc standard

Atul Deshmukh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:33:03 +0530

212 lines

New Thread

Bacterial Endotoxins test at end of shelf-life - parenteral drugs

Bacterial Endotoxins test at end of shelf-life - parenteral drugs

Nordstrom, Trine (GE Healthcare) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:25:29 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

Ball valves in water system that remain open

Ball valves in water system that remain open

Scott Rollins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:02:17 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

beta lactamase

Re: beta lactamase

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:31:00 -0500

120 lines

Re: beta lactamase

Frank Settineri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:43:26 -0800

186 lines

New Thread

Biological challenge test for continuous bio kill system

Biological challenge test for continuous bio kill system

황희구 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:58:05 +0900

75 lines

Re: Biological challenge test for continuous bio kill system

Eddington Don <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:48:13 +0100

155 lines

New Thread

Biological Indicators in routine

Biological Indicators in routine

Defterigou Olga <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:56:39 +0200

78 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:39:42 +0000

129 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:37:58 +0100

151 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

avadhesh patidar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 22:10:57 -0800

83 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

Brian Matthews <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:54:59 +0000

212 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:17:37 +0000

196 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

Shweta Bajoria <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:50:23 +0530

248 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

ADRIAN AMODIA ALMEIDA <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:35:41 -0800

55 lines

Re: Biological Indicators in routine

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:15:41 -0500

331 lines

New Thread

Consumer Care R&D Microbiologists?

Consumer Care R&D Microbiologists?

Paul Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:44:21 -0600

63 lines

New Thread

container closure integrity

container closure integrity

Sara Sevillano <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:30:37 +0100

100 lines

New Thread

Definition of Objectionable Microorganisms

Definition of Objectionable Microorganisms

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:08:03 -0400

63 lines

Re: Definition of Objectionable Microorganisms

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:17:09 GMT

82 lines

Re: Definition of Objectionable Microorganisms

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:21:29 -0400

141 lines

Re: Definition of Objectionable Microorganisms

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:45:05 -0400

162 lines

New Thread

Dry surface prior to application of disinfectant?

Dry surface prior to application of disinfectant?

Rex Wang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:12:10 +0800

59 lines

New Thread

Electronic LIMS

Electronic LIMS

Jessica Wentzel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:54:45 -0700

54 lines

Re: Electronic LIMS

Sally McFarlane <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:52:56 -0400

127 lines

Re: Electronic LIMS

Prinz Olivier - Basel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:09:46 +0100

119 lines

New Thread

Evaluation of operater garment bioburden

Evaluation of operater garment bioburden

Jasna Stanojevic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:03:34 +0000

95 lines

New Thread

FDA "Loses" Case on Control of Antibiotics in Livestock Feed

FDA "Loses" Case on Control of Antibiotics in Livestock Feed

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:36:21 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

Growth Promotion Requirements

Growth Promotion Requirements

Jessica Wentzel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:20:05 -0700

61 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:41:49 -0800

132 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:51:13 -0800

140 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:00:32 -0500

229 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:42:48 -0500

161 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 06:46:06 +0530

189 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Steven G. Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:51:32 +0000

293 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Jessica Wentzel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:17:20 -0700

349 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Jessica Wentzel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:28:12 -0700

374 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:50:08 -0800

140 lines

Re: Growth Promotion Requirements

Jessica Wentzel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:38:11 -0700

193 lines

New Thread

Hi all

Hi all

shekhar sonawane <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:00:20 -0700

53 lines

Re: Hi all

Danica Sego <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:27:12 +0200

117 lines

Re: Hi all

Wood, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:47:30 -0700

127 lines

Re: Hi all

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:41:50 -0700

113 lines

Re: Hi all

Shweta Bajoria <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:32:29 +0530

108 lines

Re: Hi all

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:49:12 -0400

178 lines

Re: Hi all

anjireddy reddy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:44:28 +0530

166 lines

New Thread

Hold Times for Bioburden samples

Hold Times for Bioburden samples

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:25:29 +0000

78 lines

Re: Hold Times for Bioburden samples

Wood, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:00:06 -0700

160 lines

Re: Hold Times for Bioburden samples

Jan Guillemette <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:27:58 -0400

147 lines

Re: Hold Times for Bioburden samples

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:06:08 -0700

154 lines

Re: Hold Times for Bioburden samples

Margo Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:10:24 -0700

143 lines

Re: Hold Times for Bioburden samples

Luis Raices <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:43:49 -0400

224 lines

Re: Hold Times for Bioburden samples

TeriC Soli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:20:53 -0400

238 lines

New Thread

Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:16:41 -0400

72 lines

Re: Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

James Rickloff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:01:39 +0000

86 lines

Re: Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

Eddington Don <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:57:45 -0400

137 lines

Re: Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

Carol Lampe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:36:31 -0500

146 lines

Re: Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:55:19 -0400

152 lines

Re: Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

Steven G. Richter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:24:42 +0000

127 lines

Re: Is an isolator sterile or decontaminated?

Dr. Michael J. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:12:13 -0400

135 lines

New Thread

ISO-8573

ISO-8573

Samantha Hewer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:52:52 -0700

61 lines

Re: ISO-8573

Wood, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:12:30 -0700

136 lines

New Thread

Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Knutsen, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:19:43 -0400

76 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:59:27 -0700

141 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:33:41 -0700

151 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Lucia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:11:42 -0300

130 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

vivek nayak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:11:00 -0700

100 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Marion Andersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:29:54 -0600

89 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Luis Raices <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:22:18 -0400

212 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Gregg Mosley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:28:42 -0500

170 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Md. Mainul Hoque <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:57:09 +0430

136 lines

Re: Laminar Flow Hood vs Biological Safety Cabinet

Ozlem Kizilkecili <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:12:35 +0200

275 lines

New Thread

Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

Re: Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

Erickson, Marianne C. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:48:28 +0000

119 lines

Re: Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:05:30 -0500

143 lines

Re: Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:52:10 -0500

123 lines

Re: Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:08:36 -0800

177 lines

Re: Looking for other R&D Microbiologist

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 21:11:41 -0500

259 lines

New Thread

MB cytostatic

MB cytostatic

Olja Knezevic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:44:42 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

Media Hold study

Re: Media Hold study

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:58:30 +0530

197 lines

New Thread

microbial testing of paper & soap

microbial testing of paper & soap

Jasvinder Chahal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:42:57 +0530

86 lines

Re: microbial testing of paper & soap

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:00:27 -0400

156 lines

Re: microbial testing of paper & soap

ST Tien-ungoon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:46:40 +0700

135 lines

Re: microbial testing of paper & soap

Jasvinder Chahal <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:04:46 +0530

218 lines

Re: microbial testing of paper & soap

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:32:01 -0400

246 lines

New Thread

microbiological examination of non-sterile products, BP appendix XVI B

microbiological examination of non-sterile products, BP appendix XVI B

Andile Dlamini <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:38:03 +0200

97 lines

Re: microbiological examination of non-sterile products, BP appendix XVI B

avadhesh patidar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 23:23:52 -0800

113 lines

New Thread

Modified Media Fill?

Modified Media Fill?

Marc Herbranson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:30:20 -0500

44 lines

Re: Modified Media Fill?

chiliveri goud <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:10:38 +0800

103 lines

New Thread

non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane

non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane

Sherry Bogle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:27:38 -0800

67 lines

Re: non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane

Tony A. Rook <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:42:13 -0500

143 lines

Re: non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:53:53 -0800

138 lines

Re: non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:10:05 -0800

194 lines

Re: non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane

Leesa McBurnie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:29:37 +0000

79 lines

Re: non-penetration of B. diminuta through a 0.45 mcm PES membrane

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 07:25:11 +0530

116 lines

New Thread

Organism resuscitation

Organism resuscitation

Trupti Bhagat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:02:46 +0530

85 lines

New Thread

PQ for Liquid Particle Counter

PQ for Liquid Particle Counter

Lim, Chin Chuan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:32:14 +0000

81 lines

Re: PQ for Liquid Particle Counter

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:44:47 -0800

152 lines

Re: PQ for Liquid Particle Counter

avadhesh patidar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 23:00:27 -0800

97 lines

New Thread

Question: Microbial Product Design Considerations for Non-sterile Products Used by Immuno-compromised Individuals

Question: Microbial Product Design Considerations for Non-sterile Products Used by Immuno-compromised Individuals

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:28:00 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

Reference for having to Test Bioburden Samples within 24 hours of sample receipt

Reference for having to Test Bioburden Samples within 24 hours of sample receipt

Matthew Moreno <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:45:02 +0000

66 lines

Re: Reference for having to Test Bioburden Samples within 24 hours of sample receipt

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:28:48 -0800

139 lines

Re: Reference for having to Test Bioburden Samples within 24 hours of sample receipt

Kathleen Baxter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:09:16 -0500

218 lines

New Thread

Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

Re: Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:44:11 -0500

200 lines

Re: Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

SHADY ABD EL-RAOUF <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:21:09 +0000

344 lines

Re: Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:37:23 -0800

407 lines

Re: Regarding usp test for absence of bile tolerant gram-negative bacteria

Wong, Gilman (Hong Kong) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:49:52 -0500

433 lines

New Thread

RV: Microbial testing of containers

RV: Microbial testing of containers

Veronica Percovich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:22:24 -0300

78 lines

New Thread

Salmonella testing

Salmonella testing

g madhu <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:45:54 -0000

57 lines

Re: Salmonella testing

Tony Cundell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:24:07 -0500

109 lines

New Thread

Something for the weekend

Something for the weekend

Robert Ryan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:38:30 +0000

100 lines

New Thread

Sterile glove lot/inventory control

Sterile glove lot/inventory control

Kara Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:09:15 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

Sterile Wet Swab For environmental monitoring

Sterile Wet Swab For environmental monitoring

Mete Han Akkoyun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 04:49:26 -0800

55 lines

Re: Sterile Wet Swab For environmental monitoring

Sally McFarlane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:19:59 -0500

141 lines

Re: Sterile Wet Swab For environmental monitoring

STOCKMAN Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:17:25 +0100

214 lines

New Thread

Sterility check of media

Sterility check of media

Henry, Kieran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:55:45 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

sterility test method validation

sterility test method validation

Karthi keyan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:45:29 -0000

81 lines

Re: sterility test method validation

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:12:15 -0400

156 lines

New Thread

Sterilization Validation Aproach

Sterilization Validation Aproach

ADRIAN AMODIA ALMEIDA <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 05:01:30 -0700

60 lines

Re: Sterilization Validation Aproach

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:48:06 -0700

128 lines

Re: Sterilization Validation Aproach

White, Edward K <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:50:15 +0000

86 lines

New Thread

Storage practice for Tri-clamp and Gaskets

Storage practice for Tri-clamp and Gaskets

Chen, Hannah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:50:37 -0400

74 lines

Re: Storage practice for Tri-clamp and Gaskets

Jeff S One <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:39:29 -0500

150 lines

New Thread

TAMC

TAMC

Omar Deeba <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 04:29:12 -0800

53 lines

Re: TAMC

Ahmed Gasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:52:46 -0800

83 lines

New Thread

Typed C.albicans

Typed C.albicans

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:28:18 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

U.V efficacy test

Re: U.V efficacy test

David Carlberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:10:24 -0800

257 lines

Re: U.V efficacy test

anjireddy reddy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:31:00 +0530

237 lines

New Thread

use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

Sue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:54:08 -0500

63 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

Long, Lori <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:51:51 -0500

139 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

Luongo, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:07:45 -0500

176 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:49:34 -0500

129 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

Byron Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:29:17 -0800

131 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

Polarine, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:09:58 -0600

143 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:00:20 -0500

213 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 23:24:17 +0530

190 lines

Re: use of 70% Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA)

ali raza <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:48:26 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

Use of Sodium actate in terminal sterilzation

Use of Sodium actate in terminal sterilzation

Rocky Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:26:48 +0800

58 lines

New Thread

USP 61 62 Validation

USP 61 62 Validation

Deepika Ananda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:33:08 -0500

78 lines

Re: USP 61 62 Validation

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:31:15 -0800

136 lines

Re: USP 61 62 Validation

Deepika Ananda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:12:44 -0500

200 lines

Re: USP 61 62 Validation

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 06:47:31 +0530

126 lines

Re: USP 61 62 Validation

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:12:16 +0530

290 lines

Re: USP 61 62 Validation

rajesheranna kamlapur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:28:50 +0530

368 lines

Re: USP 61 62 Validation

ADRIAN AMODIA ALMEIDA <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:10:23 -0800

59 lines

Re: USP 61 62 Validation

Madupa papaiah <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:02:34 +0530

263 lines

New Thread

USP 62

USP 62

Deepika Ananda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 09:05:33 -0500

64 lines

Re: USP 62

Deepika Ananda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:53:33 -0500

118 lines

Re: USP 62

Coyle, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:38:36 +0000

139 lines

Re: USP 62

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:12:23 -0400

128 lines

Re: USP 62

Deepika Ananda <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:11:50 -0400

199 lines

Re: USP 62

Coyle, Andrew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:48:00 +0000

418 lines

Re: USP 62

Jonathan Swenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:35:51 +0000

280 lines

Re: USP 62

Chennupalli7 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:42:36 -0400

275 lines

Re: USP 62

Robert Ryan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:44:36 +0000

84 lines

New Thread

USP growth promotion - selective media

Re: USP growth promotion - selective media

Deepika Ananda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:10:23 -0500

316 lines

New Thread

Validation of Air Samplers

Validation of Air Samplers

Luis Raices <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:59:59 -0400

67 lines

Re: Validation of Air Samplers

Wekhande, Vaishnavi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:29:14 +0000

171 lines

New Thread

What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Jayshree Mishra <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:17:29 -0400

58 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Scott Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:01:03 -0400

121 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Sadasivan, Lakshmi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:18:43 +0100

145 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Brianne Riley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:15:26 +0000

117 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:03:05 -0400

109 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:53:36 -0700

120 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

satish bansode <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:07:06 +0530

115 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Pilar Orus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:41:33 +0100

187 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:21:47 -0400

133 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Jerry R. Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:49:59 +0000

184 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Wekhande, Vaishnavi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:03:48 +0000

183 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Jim Tanabe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:31:20 -0700

190 lines

Re: What causes Fungal Growth in Cosmetic Product (Night Cream)?

Corpuz, Judith [NEUUS] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:31:00 -0700

218 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.MICROBIOLOGYNETWORK.COM

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager