PMFLIST Archives

July 1999


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Steven G Richter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Pharmaceutical Microbiology Mail List <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 16:56:56 -0400
text/plain (50 lines)
Dear Lucy,

No increase from initial inoculation is the way  we interpreted it,  if
there is a difference between the  time points and initial populations
(which there is that possibility) then the increase should be from the last
time point.  We base this on the propensity for the theoretical inoculation
data  or time zero population data to be one standard deviation off.

Steve Richter Ph.D.

At 09:13 AM 7/8/99 -0400, you wrote:
>I would like to hear from the group with regards to interpretation of EP
>AET limits.  When the EP call for no increase (NI), do you interpret that as
>no increase from the initial inoculum as per USP or no increase from the
>previous timepoint tested?  We are currently debating this with our QM
>Thank you
>Lucy Lee (Hall Dive Location)
>Microbiology Business Associate II
>AAI - Microbiology
>1206 North 23rd Street
>Wilmington NC 28405
>Phone: (910) 251-6754           SAME PHONE NUMBER
>Fax:     (910) 763-5899         NEW FAX NUMBER AT HALL ST
>The PMFList ( is operated from
>The Microbiology Network ( and supported by
>our sponsors ( as a service to
>the scientific community.
Steven G. Richter Ph.D.
Microtest Laboratories, Inc.
[log in to unmask]

The PMFList ( is operated from
The Microbiology Network ( and supported by
our sponsors ( as a service to
the scientific community.