PMFLIST Archives

December 2003


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Brenda Cantillon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Pharmaceutical Microbiology Forum Email List <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:02:10 +0000
text/plain (40 lines)
I have a question for the group about reporting total aerobic count results
for samples tested by membrane filtration.

The procedure is as follows:  (ref Ph. Eur. 2.6.12)
For  total  viable count (non-sterile product) a 10g sample is dissolved in
buffer  and  membrane  filtered  onto  2  plates  e.g.  each  plate  volume
represents 5g of product.  The total count between the 2 plates is quoted -
not an average.

Typically  even  counts are obtained on plates e.g. 4 on one plate and 5 on
the  other....  However, recently we saw an unusual variation of a count of
28 CFU on one plate and 7 CFU on another plate, and also 8 CFU on one plate
and none on the other for a different sample?
Is this just typical of uneven distribution of m/os in the sample?
Does it look like analyst error? Should the result be invalidated?
Should we have a limit of variation of counts between 2 plates?

thanks and regards,

The PMFList ( is operated from
The Microbiology Network ( and supported by
our sponsors ( as a service to
the scientific community.

Please take a second to visit our sponsors' web sites and say thank you for their support of this service.
Accugenix -
Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems -
Microcheck -
MIDI, Inc. -
Microbial ID, Inc. -
MicroTest World Class Services -
MIDI Labs, Inc. -
Millipore -
NovaTek International -
Raven Biological Labs -
Veltek Associates, Inc -